These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32719906)

  • 1. Accuracy of interproximal enamel reduction during clear aligner treatment.
    De Felice ME; Nucci L; Fiori A; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L; Grassia V
    Prog Orthod; 2020 Jul; 21(1):28. PubMed ID: 32719906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enamel interproximal reduction during treatment with clear aligners: digital planning versus OrthoCAD analysis.
    Laganà G; Malara A; Lione R; Danesi C; Meuli S; Cozza P
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 33874922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictability of crowding resolution in clear aligner treatment.
    Fiori A; Minervini G; Nucci L; d'Apuzzo F; Perillo L; Grassia V
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Nov; 23(1):43. PubMed ID: 36437397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of interproximal reduction in individual teeth, and full arch assessment in clear aligner therapy: digital planning versus 3D model analysis after reduction.
    Hariharan A; Arqub SA; Gandhi V; Da Cunha Godoy L; Kuo CL; Uribe F
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Mar; 23(1):9. PubMed ID: 35254555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative evaluation of implemented interproximal enamel reduction during aligner therapy.
    Kalemaj Z; Levrini L
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jan; 91(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 33339043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of temperature rise in the pulp during various IPR techniques-an in vivo study.
    Banga K; Arora N; Kannan S; Singh AK; Malhotra A
    Prog Orthod; 2020 Nov; 21(1):40. PubMed ID: 33135774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. IPR treatment and attachments design in clear aligner therapy and risk of open gingival embrasures in adults.
    Zhang Y; Wang X; Wang J; Gao J; Liu X; Jin Z; Ma Y
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Jan; 24(1):1. PubMed ID: 36617584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and Accuracy of Maxillary Arch Expansion with Clear Aligner Treatment.
    Galluccio G; De Stefano AA; Horodynski M; Impellizzeri A; Guarnieri R; Barbato E; Di Carlo S; De Angelis F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the abrasive properties of two different systems for interproximal enamel reduction: oscillating versus manual strips.
    Gazzani F; Lione R; Pavoni C; Mampieri G; Cozza P
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):247. PubMed ID: 31727047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manual and mechanical stripping-induced enamel roughness and elemental composition in vivo.
    Katsigialou N; Sifakakis I; Zinelis S; Papageorgiou SN; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 May; 45(3):250-257. PubMed ID: 36308302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interproximal enamel reduction as a part of orthodontic treatment.
    Lapenaite E; Lopatiene K
    Stomatologija; 2014; 16(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24824056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atomic force microscopy analysis of enamel nanotopography after interproximal reduction.
    Meredith L; Farella M; Lowrey S; Cannon RD; Mei L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):750-757. PubMed ID: 28364899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Maxillary expansion efficiency with clear aligner and its possible influencing factors].
    Zhao X; Wang HH; Yang YM; Tang GH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 52(9):543-548. PubMed ID: 29972918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Depth of acid penetration and enamel surface roughness associated with different methods of interproximal enamel reduction.
    Danesh G; Podstawa PKK; Schwartz CE; Kirschneck C; Bizhang M; Arnold WH
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229595. PubMed ID: 32119700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative comparison of 3 enamel-stripping devices in vitro: how precisely can we strip teeth?
    Johner AM; Pandis N; Dudic A; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S168-72. PubMed ID: 23540634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthodontic treatment with a series of removable appliances.
    Chenin DA; Trosien AH; Fong PF; Miller RA; Lee RS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Sep; 134(9):1232-9. PubMed ID: 14528995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Thermal Changes among Four Different Interproximal Reduction Systems in Orthodontics.
    Omer ABA; Sanea JA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jun; 20(6):738-742. PubMed ID: 31358719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Guidelines for clear aligner orthodontic treatment (2021)].
    Society of Orthodontics, Chinese Stomatological Association
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Oct; 56(10):983-988. PubMed ID: 34619891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enamel stripping and the spring aligner appliance--an update.
    Lew KK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):841-6. PubMed ID: 20830878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Esthetic orthodontic treatment using the invisalign appliance for moderate to complex malocclusions.
    Boyd RL
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Aug; 72(8):948-67. PubMed ID: 18676803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.