These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32720732)

  • 21. Biodiversity offsets and the challenge of achieving no net loss.
    Gardner TA; VON Hase A; Brownlie S; Ekstrom JM; Pilgrim JD; Savy CE; Stephens RT; Treweek J; Ussher GT; Ward G; Ten Kate K
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1254-64. PubMed ID: 24033441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Review of Condition Metrics Used in Biodiversity Offsetting.
    Borges-Matos C; Maron M; Metzger JP
    Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 72(4):727-740. PubMed ID: 37477675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mining and biodiversity offsets: a transparent and science-based approach to measure "no-net-loss".
    Virah-Sawmy M; Ebeling J; Taplin R
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Oct; 143():61-70. PubMed ID: 24866419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Time-lagged effects of habitat fragmentation on terrestrial mammals in Madagascar.
    Broekman MJE; Hilbers JP; Schipper AM; Benítez-López A; Santini L; Huijbregts MAJ
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13942. PubMed ID: 35603483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No net loss for people and biodiversity.
    Griffiths VF; Bull JW; Baker J; Milner-Gulland EJ
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Feb; 33(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 30070731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species.
    Camaclang AE; Maron M; Martin TG; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):482-92. PubMed ID: 25472827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When is an Offset Not an Offset? A Framework of Necessary Conditions for Biodiversity Offsets.
    Pope J; Morrison-Saunders A; Bond A; Retief F
    Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 67(2):424-435. PubMed ID: 33481092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conservation Planning for Offsetting the Impacts of Development: A Case Study of Biodiversity and Renewable Energy in the Mojave Desert.
    Kreitler J; Schloss CA; Soong O; Hannah L; Davis FW
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0140226. PubMed ID: 26529595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost shifting and other perverse incentives in biodiversity offsetting in India.
    Narain D; Maron M
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):782-788. PubMed ID: 29473220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Expert predictions of changes in vegetation condition reveal perceived risks in biodiversity offsetting.
    Dorrough J; Sinclair SJ; Oliver I
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216703. PubMed ID: 31067268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction.
    Thomson JR; Moilanen AJ; Vesk PA; Bennett AF; Nally RM
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Jun; 19(4):817-28. PubMed ID: 19544726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The least-cost biodiversity impact mitigation hierarchy with a focus on marine fisheries and bycatch issues.
    Squires D; Garcia S
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):989-997. PubMed ID: 30028536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Flexibility trade-offs in conservation offsets.
    Drechsler M
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Feb; 38(1):e14144. PubMed ID: 37424366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system.
    Roberts KE; Cook CN; Beher J; Treml EA
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):699-710. PubMed ID: 32623761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biodiversity offsets: two New Zealand case studies and an assessment framework.
    Norton DA
    Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 43(4):698-706. PubMed ID: 18726050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Offsetting impacts of development on biodiversity and ecosystem services.
    Sonter LJ; Gordon A; Archibald C; Simmonds JS; Ward M; Metzger JP; Rhodes JR; Maron M
    Ambio; 2020 Apr; 49(4):892-902. PubMed ID: 31506844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Social preferences for the design of biodiversity offsets for shorebirds in Australia.
    Rogers AA; Burton MP
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):828-836. PubMed ID: 27925315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Achieving biodiversity net gain by addressing governance gaps underpinning ecological compensation policies.
    Rampling EE; Zu Ermgassen SOSE; Hawkins I; Bull JW
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14198. PubMed ID: 37811729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A multispecies test of source-sink indicators to prioritize habitat for declining populations.
    Heinrichs JA; Lawler JJ; Schumaker NH; Wilsey CB; Monroe KC; Aldridge CL
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Jun; 32(3):648-659. PubMed ID: 29193292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Combining landscape-level conservation planning and biodiversity offset programs: a case study.
    Underwood JG
    Environ Manage; 2011 Jan; 47(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 21113781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.