181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32720868)
21. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps in CT colonography with and without fecal tagging: a stand-alone evaluation.
Mang T; Bogoni L; Salganicoff M; Wolf M; Raykar V; Macari M; Pickhardt PJ; Iafrate F; Laghi A; Weber M; Baker ME; Ringl H; Herold CJ; Graser A
Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 21934519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Polyp characteristics correctly annotated by computer-aided detection software but ignored by reporting radiologists during CT colonography.
Taylor SA; Robinson C; Boone D; Honeyfield L; Halligan S
Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 19789221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography.
Morrin MM; Farrell RJ; Kruskal JB; Reynolds K; McGee JB; Raptopoulos V
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):765-71. PubMed ID: 11110941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dual energy virtual CT colonoscopy with dual source computed tomography: initial experience.
Karcaaltincaba M; Karaosmanoglu D; Akata D; Sentürk S; Ozmen M; Alibek S
Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):859-62. PubMed ID: 19623508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings.
Bräuer C; Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Ringl H; Al-Mukhtar A; Apfaltrer P; Berzaczy D; Füger B; Furtner J; Müller-Mang C; Pones M; Scharitzer M; Woitek R; Graser A; Weber M; Mang T
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4766-4774. PubMed ID: 29761359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nonlaxative PET/CT colonography: feasibility, acceptability, and pilot performance in patients at higher risk of colonic neoplasia.
Taylor SA; Bomanji JB; Manpanzure L; Robinson C; Groves AM; Dickson J; Papathanasiou ND; Greenhalgh R; Ell PJ; Halligan S
J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):854-61. PubMed ID: 20484420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Structure-analysis method for electronic cleansing in cathartic and noncathartic CT colonography.
Cai W; Zalis ME; Näppi J; Harris GJ; Yoshida H
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3259-77. PubMed ID: 18697551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transparent rendering of intraluminal contrast for 3D polyp visualization at CT colonography.
Shi R; Napel S; Rosenberg JK; Shin LK; Walsh CF; Mogensen MA; Joshi AJ; Pankhudi P; Beaulieu CF
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):773-9. PubMed ID: 17895791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.
Lefere PA; Gryspeerdt SS; Dewyspelaere J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck BG
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 12147834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Electronic colon-cleansing for CT colonography: diagnostic performance.
Juchems MS; Ernst A; Johnson P; Virmani S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 18343970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Technique to Identify Isoattenuating Gallstones with Dual-Layer Spectral CT: An ex Vivo Phantom Study.
Soesbe TC; Lewis MA; Xi Y; Browning T; Ananthakrishnan L; Fielding JR; Lenkinski RE; Leyendecker JR
Radiology; 2019 Aug; 292(2):400-406. PubMed ID: 31264945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adaptive correction of the pseudo-enhancement of CT attenuation for fecal-tagging CT colonography.
Näppi J; Yoshida H
Med Image Anal; 2008 Aug; 12(4):413-426. PubMed ID: 18313349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contrast-Enhanced CT colonography.
Morrin MM; Raptopoulos V
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2001 Oct; 22(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 11665920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the performance of conventional and spectral-based tagged stool cleansing algorithms at CT colonography.
Grosu S; Wiemker R; An C; Obmann MM; Wong E; Yee J; Yeh BM
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7936-7945. PubMed ID: 35486170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Serrated Polyps at CT Colonography: Prevalence and Characteristics of the Serrated Polyp Spectrum.
Kim DH; Matkowskyj KA; Lubner MG; Hinshaw JL; Munoz Del Rio A; Pooler BD; Weiss JM; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 26878227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer assisted detection software for CT colonography: effect of sphericity filter on performance characteristics for patients with and without fecal tagging.
Dehmeshki J; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Roddie ME; McQuillan J; Honeyfield L; Amin H
Eur Radiol; 2007 Mar; 17(3):662-8. PubMed ID: 17021701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps.
Johnson CD; MacCarty RL; Welch TJ; Wilson LA; Harmsen WS; Ilstrup DM; Ahlquist DA
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Apr; 2(4):314-21. PubMed ID: 15067626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
