These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32721481)
41. Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Micro-computed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars. van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F; Vorster M; de Wet FA J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 30446405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography. Celikten B; Uzuntas CF; Kursun S; Orhan AI; Tufenkci P; Orhan K; Demiralp KÖ BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():32. PubMed ID: 25887521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Non-surgical endodontic treatment for dens invaginatus type III using cone beam computed tomography and dental operating microscope: a case report. Kato H Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2013; 54(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 23903581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Precision of Dynamic Navigation to Perform Endodontic Ultraconservative Access Cavities: A Preliminary In Vitro Analysis. Gambarini G; Galli M; Morese A; Stefanelli LV; Abduljabbar F; Giovarruscio M; Di Nardo D; Seracchiani M; Testarelli L J Endod; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1286-1290. PubMed ID: 32553875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Guided Endodontic Access in Maxillary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing System: A Case Report. Lara-Mendes STO; Barbosa CFM; Santa-Rosa CC; Machado VC J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):875-879. PubMed ID: 29571910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Influence of CBCT parameters on the output of an automatic edge-detection-based endodontic segmentation. Michetti J; Georgelin-Gurgel M; Mallet JP; Diemer F; Boulanouar K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20140413. PubMed ID: 26119343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of restoration volume on stresses in a mandibular molar: a finite element study. Wayne JS; Chande R; Porter HC; Janus C J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):925-31. PubMed ID: 24726589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A Micro-computed Tomographic Assessment of Root Canal Preparation with a Novel Instrument, TRUShape, in Mesial Roots of Mandibular Molars. Peters OA; Arias A; Paqué F J Endod; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 26238528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path. Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2053-6. PubMed ID: 25301350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of the cervical integrity during occlusal loading of Class II restorations. Campos PE; Barceleiro Mde O; Sampaio-Filho HR; Martins LR Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18335734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of Truss Access and Artificial Truss Restoration on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Mandibular First Molars. Abou-Elnaga MY; Alkhawas MAM; Kim HC; Refai AS J Endod; 2019 Jun; 45(6):813-817. PubMed ID: 30905571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effect of bulk-fill composites: Activa and Smart Dentin Replacement on cuspal deflection in endodontically treated teeth with different access cavity designs. Karale R; Prathima BJ; Prashanth BR; Shivaranjan NS; Jain N J Conserv Dent; 2022; 25(4):375-379. PubMed ID: 36187866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Influence of Root Canal System Landmarks on Access Outline Forms and Canal Curvatures in Mandibular Molars. Eaton JA; Clement DJ; Lloyd A; Marchesan MA J Endod; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1888-91. PubMed ID: 26433857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of Instrument Design and Access Outlines on the Removal of Root Canal Obturation Materials in Oval-shaped Canals. Niemi TK; Marchesan MA; Lloyd A; Seltzer RJ J Endod; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1550-4. PubMed ID: 27552837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Detection of Fractured Endodontic Instruments in Root Canals: Comparison between Different Digital Radiography Systems and Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Ramos Brito AC; Verner FS; Junqueira RB; Yamasaki MC; Queiroz PM; Freitas DQ; Oliveira-Santos C J Endod; 2017 Apr; 43(4):544-549. PubMed ID: 28216273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments. Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Tooth coronal index and pulp/tooth ratio in dental age estimation on digital panoramic radiographs-A comparative study. Jain S; Nagi R; Daga M; Shandilya A; Shukla A; Parakh A; Laheji A; Singh R Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():115-121. PubMed ID: 28645095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Impact of contracted endodontic cavities on instrumentation efficacy-A systematic review. Shroff M; Kishan KV; Shah N; Saklecha P Aust Endod J; 2023 Apr; 49(1):202-212. PubMed ID: 36029227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Presentation of gaps around endodontic access cavity restoration by phase contrast-enhanced micro-CT. Križnar I; Zanini F; Fidler A Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2371-2381. PubMed ID: 30302609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]