425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32721483)
1. Smear Layer Removal Using Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite.
Orlowski NB; Schimdt TF; Teixeira CDS; Garcia LDFR; Savaris JM; Tay FR; Bortoluzzi EA
J Endod; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1738-1744. PubMed ID: 32721483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.
Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L
J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.
Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L
BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Ultrasonic Activation of Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal.
Schmidt TF; Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT; Pashley DH; Bortoluzzi EA
J Endod; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1359-63. PubMed ID: 25960002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Did in-between rinsing and agitating with distilled water prevents precipitate formation by the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine canal irrigants?
Maiola EC; Boppré LM; Savaris JM; Dias Junior LCL; Garcia LDFR; Teixeira CDS; Bortoluzzi EA
Microsc Res Tech; 2024 Feb; 87(2):315-325. PubMed ID: 37811954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals.
Capar ID; Ozcan E; Arslan H; Ertas H; Aydinbelge HA
J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):451-4. PubMed ID: 24565670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation].
Xin Y; Yang J; Song KY
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30854818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Kamel WH; Kataia EM
J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of time and ultrasonic activation on ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal of the root canal.
de Castro FP; Pinheiro SL; Duarte MA; Duque JA; Fernandes SL; Anchieta RB; da Silveira Bueno CE
Microsc Res Tech; 2016 Nov; 79(11):1062-1068. PubMed ID: 27535641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens.
Naaman A; Kaloustian H; Ounsi HF; Naaman-Bou Abboud N; Ricci C; Medioni E
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 17211500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic, and peracetic acids activated with ultrasonics or diode laser on calcium hydroxide removal from root canal walls.
Savur IG; Ulusoy OI
Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Nov; 24(11):1662-1668. PubMed ID: 34782506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Primary Mandibular Second Molars: An
Hachem CE; Nehme W; Kaloustian MK; Ghosn N; Daou M; Zogheib C; Karam M; Mhanna R; Macaluso V; Kharouf N; Chedid JCA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1173-1179. PubMed ID: 37073943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant.
Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T
Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.
Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of EDTA, sodium, and calcium hypochlorite on the inorganic component of root canal dentin: A SEM analysis.
Cardoso LR; Baldasso FER; Delai D; Montagner F; Kopper PMP
Microsc Res Tech; 2019 Feb; 82(2):128-133. PubMed ID: 30582246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
