These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32722776)

  • 1. Spare Roof Technique Versus Component Dorsal Hump Reduction: A Randomized Prospective Study in 250 Primary Rhinoplasties, Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes.
    Ferreira MG; Santos M; E Carmo DO; Fertuzinhos A; E Sousa CA; Santos J; Dourado N; Amarante J
    Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Feb; 41(3):288-300. PubMed ID: 32722776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shaved Cartilage Gel Versus Diced Cartilage on Final Dorsal Camouflage: Prospective Study of 200 Patients.
    Santos M; Ribeiro A; Almeida E Sousa C; Santos J; Dourado N; Amarante J; Gonçalves Ferreira M
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021; 23(3):164-171. PubMed ID: 32721239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spare roof technique in reduction rhinoplasty: Prospective study of the first one hundred patients.
    Santos M; Rego ÂR; Coutinho M; Sousa CAE; Ferreira MG
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Dec; 129(12):2702-2706. PubMed ID: 30628092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Spare Roof Technique as a New Approach to the Crooked Nose.
    Rodrigues Dias D; Santos M; Sousa E Castro S; Almeida E Sousa C; Gonçalves Ferreira M
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2022; 24(3):178-184. PubMed ID: 35404125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commentary on: Spare Roof Technique Versus Component Dorsal Hump Reduction: A Randomized Prospective Study in 250 Primary Rhinoplasties, Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes.
    Gruber RP; Rochlin D; McClure K
    Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Feb; 41(3):301-303. PubMed ID: 33184633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome of rhinoplasty in patients undergoing autospreader flaps without notable dorsal hump reduction: A clinical trial.
    Sazgar AA; Razmara N; Razfar A; Sazgar AK; Amali A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Oct; 72(10):1688-1693. PubMed ID: 31444056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient satisfaction in Caucasian and Mediterranean open rhinoplasty using the tongue-in-groove technique: prospective statistical analysis of change in subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance following aesthetic rhinoplasty.
    Lohuis PJ; Datema FR
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):831-6. PubMed ID: 25389075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Split hump technique for reduction of the overprojected nasal dorsum: a statistical analysis on subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and nasal patency in 97 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty.
    Lohuis PJ; Faraj-Hakim S; Knobbe A; Duivesteijn W; Bran GM
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2012; 14(5):346-53. PubMed ID: 22986942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spare Roof Technique: A New Technique for Hump Removal-The Step-by-Step Guide.
    Gonçalves Ferreira M; Santos M; Rosa F; Sousa CA; Santos J; Dourado N; Amarante J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):403-406. PubMed ID: 31985631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Component dorsal hump reduction: the importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty.
    Rohrich RJ; Muzaffar AR; Janis JE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1298-308; discussion 1309-12. PubMed ID: 15457053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Dorsal Preservation and Dorsal Reduction Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Nasal Patency and Aesthetic Outcomes by Rhinomanometry, NOSE and SCHNOS Scales.
    Alan MA; Kahraman ME; Yüksel F; Yücel A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Apr; 47(2):728-734. PubMed ID: 36302983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dorsal Roof Technique for Dorsum Preservation in Rhinoplasty.
    Taş S
    Aesthet Surg J; 2020 Feb; 40(3):263-275. PubMed ID: 30980075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dorsal Hump Reduction and Midvault Reconstruction.
    Pyfer BJ; Atia AN; Marcus JR
    Clin Plast Surg; 2022 Jan; 49(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 34782142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid Preservation Rhinoplasty: Combining Mix-Down and Semi Let-Push Down Techniques.
    Öztürk G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 33(6):1885-1889. PubMed ID: 35148532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Component Dorsal Hump Reduction on Patient-Perceived Nasal Aesthetics and Obstruction in Rhinoplasty.
    Burks CA; Weitzman RE; Lindsay RW
    Laryngoscope; 2022 Nov; 132(11):2157-2161. PubMed ID: 35188669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of Combined Anterior Septal Reconstruction and Dorsal Hump Reduction.
    Patel PN; Kandathil CK; Most SP
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Dec; 130(12):E803-E810. PubMed ID: 32163185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining Preoperative Expectations and Postoperative Satisfaction in Rhinoplasty Patients: A Single-Center Study.
    Kandathil CK; Patel PN; Spataro EA; Most SP
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021 Sep; 23(5):375-382. PubMed ID: 33337943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dorsal Preservation: The Push Down Technique Reassessed.
    Saban Y; Daniel RK; Polselli R; Trapasso M; Palhazi P
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(2):117-131. PubMed ID: 29319787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Evaluation Methods in Open Technique Septorhinoplasty.
    Başer E; Kocagöz GD; Çalim ÖF; Verim A; Yilmaz F; Özturan O
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):420-4. PubMed ID: 26967078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified Skoog Method for Hump Reduction.
    Fuller JC; Hilger PA
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2021 Feb; 29(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 33220838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.