251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32722823)
1. Term Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery Risk among Obese Women with and without Comorbidities.
Glazer KB; Danilack VA; Field AE; Werner EF; Savitz DA
Am J Perinatol; 2022 Jan; 39(2):154-164. PubMed ID: 32722823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
Kawakita T; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
Gibbs Pickens CM; Kramer MR; Howards PP; Badell ML; Caughey AB; Hogue CJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.
Palatnik A; Kominiarek MA
Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):695-707. PubMed ID: 31039597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index.
Kawakita T; Reddy UM; Landy HJ; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Grantz KL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):515.e1-9. PubMed ID: 27210064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.
Hersh AR; Urbanowicz E; Garg B; Schmidt EM; Packer CH; Caughey AB
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1061-e1068. PubMed ID: 36452970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Grobman WA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Miller NR; Cypher RL; Foglia LM; Pates JA; Nielsen PE
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 26551184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cesarean delivery after non-medically indicated induction of labor: A population-based study using different definitions of expectant management.
Zenzmaier C; Pfeifer B; Leitner H; König-Bachmann M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Feb; 100(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 32880895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is gestational age at term a risk factor for ongoing pregnancies in nulliparous women: A prospective cohort study.
Quibel T; Rozenberg P; Duvillier C; Bouyer C; Bouyer J
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Feb; 5(2):100808. PubMed ID: 36371036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hersh AR; Skeith AE; Sargent JA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
Wolfe H; Timofeev J; Tefera E; Desale S; Driggers RW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The risk of prelabor and intrapartum cesarean delivery among overweight and obese women: possible preventive actions.
Hermann M; Le Ray C; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):241.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25108139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing expectant management and spontaneous labor approaches in studying the effect of labor induction on cesarean delivery.
Danilack VA; Triche EW; Dore DD; Muri JH; Phipps MG; Savitz DA
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):405-411.e1. PubMed ID: 27211604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Darney BG; Snowden JM; Cheng YW; Jacob L; Nicholson JM; Kaimal A; Dublin S; Getahun D; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 24084532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
Sinkey RG; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Ausbeck E; Subramaniam A; Neely CL; Casey BM; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
