These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32723499)

  • 1. Misfit detection in implant-supported prostheses of different compositions by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Araujo-Siqueira C; Carneiro VC; Oliveira ML; Azeredo RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):205-213. PubMed ID: 32723499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of 4 intraoral radiographic techniques for misfit detection at the implant abutment joint.
    Darós P; Carneiro VC; Siqueira AP; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 29150129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of Three Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems in the Detection of Implant-Abutment Misfit.
    Carneiro VC; Siqueira CA; Valentim FB; Oliveira AL; Oliveira ML; Azeredo RA; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 30856646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of misfits at the abutment-prosthesis interface in the esthetic zone: Implications of the radiographic technique and the magnitude of the misfit.
    de Oliveira Mota VP; Braga MS; Loss AA; Mello HN; Rosetti EP; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):239.e1-239.e9. PubMed ID: 37455164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of radiographic acquisition methods and visualization software programs on the detection of misfits at the implant-abutment interface: An ex vivo study.
    Siqueira AP; Pacheco de Oliveira Mota V; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):107.e1-107.e7. PubMed ID: 34839908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does enhancement filter application increase the diagnostic accuracy of misfit detection at the implant-prosthesis interface?
    Mouzinho-Machado S; Borges GB; Pacheco-de-Oliveira-Mota V; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1136-1143. PubMed ID: 35570168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital immediate tooth restoration: Fabricating acrylic resin interim crowns from CBCT scans for immediate implant-supported prostheses: A case series.
    Polara G; Pistone F; Giorgio Alfredo S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):578-584. PubMed ID: 33341256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Success Rates of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Retrieval of Metal-Ceramic vs All-Ceramic Implant-Supported Restorations: An In Vitro Study.
    Neshandar Asli H; Kajan ZD; Khosravifard N; Roudbary SN; Rafiei E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(2):192–198. PubMed ID: 31995036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the success rate of cone beam computed tomography in determining the location and direction of screw access holes in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Neshandar Asli H; Dalili Kajan Z; Gholizade F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):220-224. PubMed ID: 29475756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
    Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading.
    Queiroz DA; Hagee N; Lee DJ; Zheng F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
    Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions.
    Schwindling FS; Hilgenfeld T; Weber D; Kosinski MA; Rammelsberg P; Tasaka A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1200-1208. PubMed ID: 31505065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
    Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
    Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study.
    Pinheiro LR; Scarfe WC; de Oliveira Sales MA; Gaia BF; Cortes AR; Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):741-750. PubMed ID: 28708906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
    Durack C; Patel S; Davies J; Wilson R; Mannocci F
    Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 1: Stereomicroscopic assessment of the active and passive fit.
    Rutkunas V; Dirse J; Kules D; Simonaitis T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):589-596. PubMed ID: 35527068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of dental prostheses on cone-beam CT images by the Taguchi method.
    Kuo RF; Fang KM; Ty W; Hu CY
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):207-220. PubMed ID: 26894354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.