These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32723854)

  • 1. A NICE perspective on computable biomedical knowledge.
    Mitchell A
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2020 Jul; 27(2):. PubMed ID: 32723854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-informed evidence-making.
    Chalkidou K; Walley T; Culyer A; Littlejohns P; Hoy A
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Jul; 13(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 18573766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
    Hijjeh M; Al Shaikh L; Alinier G; Selwood D; Malmstrom F; Hassan IF
    Qatar Med J; 2019; 2019(2):2. PubMed ID: 31763205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mobilising computable biomedical knowledge: challenges for clinical decision support from a medical knowledge provider.
    Walsh K; Wroe C
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2020 Jul; 27(2):. PubMed ID: 32723850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HDR UK supporting mobilising computable biomedical knowledge in the UK.
    Sebire NJ; Cake C; Morris AD
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2020 Jul; 27(2):. PubMed ID: 32723851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NICE and Fair? Health Technology Assessment Policy Under the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 1999-2018.
    Charlton V
    Health Care Anal; 2020 Sep; 28(3):193-227. PubMed ID: 31325000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling clinical narrative as computable knowledge: The NICE computable implementation guidance project.
    Scott P; Heigl M; McCay C; Shepperdson P; Lima-Walton E; Andrikopoulou E; Brunnhuber K; Cornelius G; Faulding S; McAlister B; Rowark S; South M; Thomas MR; Whatling J; Williams J; Wyatt JC; Greaves F
    Learn Health Syst; 2023 Oct; 7(4):e10394. PubMed ID: 37860056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Building the capacity for evidence-based clinical nursing leadership: the role of executive co-coaching and group clinical supervision for quality patient services.
    Alleyne J; Jumaa MO
    J Nurs Manag; 2007 Mar; 15(2):230-43. PubMed ID: 17352707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the implementation of NICE guidance: cross-sectional survey of the use of NICE interventional procedures guidance by NHS Trusts.
    Lowson K; Jenks M; Filby A; Carr L; Campbell B; Powell J
    Implement Sci; 2015 Jun; 10():93. PubMed ID: 26122560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The normative grounds for NICE decision-making: a narrative cross-disciplinary review of empirical studies.
    Charlton V
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2022 Oct; 17(4):444-470. PubMed ID: 35293306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision making in NICE single technological appraisals: How does NICE incorporate patient perspectives?
    Hashem F; Calnan MW; Brown PR
    Health Expect; 2018 Feb; 21(1):128-137. PubMed ID: 28686809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: government agency perspective.
    Taylor R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19 Suppl 2():33-8. PubMed ID: 11700787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Views of Directors of Public Health about NICE Appraisal Guidance: results of a postal survey. National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
    Davies E; Littlejohns P
    J Public Health Med; 2002 Dec; 24(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 12546211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ethics of grandfather clauses in healthcare resource allocation.
    Wester G; Gibson Rand LZ; Lu C; Sheehan M
    Bioethics; 2021 Feb; 35(2):151-160. PubMed ID: 33043477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of the role of NICE in promoting the adoption of innovative cardiac technologies.
    Groves PH; Pomfrett C; Marlow M
    Heart; 2018 Nov; 104(22):1817-1822. PubMed ID: 29773657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NICE's social value judgements about equity in health and health care.
    Shah KK; Cookson R; Culyer AJ; Littlejohns P
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2013 Apr; 8(2):145-65. PubMed ID: 22717361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.