These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32724560)

  • 21. Evaluation of a semi-automated data extraction tool for public health literature-based reviews: Dextr.
    Walker VR; Schmitt CP; Wolfe MS; Nowak AJ; Kulesza K; Williams AR; Shin R; Cohen J; Burch D; Stout MD; Shipkowski KA; Rooney AA
    Environ Int; 2022 Jan; 159():107025. PubMed ID: 34920276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semi-automated Tools for Systematic Searches.
    Adam GP; Wallace BC; Trikalinos TA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2345():17-40. PubMed ID: 34550582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review.
    Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of narrative text for injury surveillance research: a systematic review.
    McKenzie K; Scott DA; Campbell MA; McClure RJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 20159054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews.
    van Altena AJ; Spijker R; Olabarriaga SD
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 30561081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of artificial intelligence for automating or semi-automating biomedical literature analyses: A scoping review.
    Santos ÁOD; da Silva ES; Couto LM; Reis GVL; Belo VS
    J Biomed Inform; 2023 Jun; 142():104389. PubMed ID: 37187321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.
    Iannizzi C; Akl EA; Kahale LA; Dorando E; Mosunmola Aminat A; Barker JM; McKenzie JE; Haddaway NR; Piechotta V; Skoetz N
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():802. PubMed ID: 35186269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review.
    Cierco Jimenez R; Lee T; Rosillo N; Cordova R; Cree IA; Gonzalez A; Indave Ruiz BI
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):322. PubMed ID: 36522637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing author willingness to enter study information into structured data templates as part of the manuscript submission process: A pilot study.
    Wilkins AA; Whaley P; Persad AS; Druwe IL; Lee JS; Taylor MM; Shapiro AJ; Blanton Southard N; Lemeris C; Thayer KA
    Heliyon; 2022 Mar; 8(3):e09095. PubMed ID: 35846467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples.
    Bashir R; Surian D; Dunn AG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 110():42-49. PubMed ID: 30849512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis.
    Cowie K; Rahmatullah A; Hardy N; Holub K; Kallmes K
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 May; 10(5):e33219. PubMed ID: 35499859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Creating efficiencies in the extraction of data from randomized trials: a prospective evaluation of a machine learning and text mining tool.
    Gates A; Gates M; Sim S; Elliott SA; Pillay J; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34399684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review.
    Woo BFY; Tam WWS; Williams MY; Ow Yong JQY; Cheong ZY; Ong YC; Poon SN; Goh YS
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2023 Jul; 55(4):874-885. PubMed ID: 36494752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Systematic online living evidence summaries: emerging tools to accelerate evidence synthesis.
    Hair K; Wilson E; Wong C; Tsang A; Macleod M; Bannach-Brown A
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2023 May; 137(10):773-784. PubMed ID: 37219941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
    O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Wolfe MS
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 29316980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Artificial intelligence and automation of systematic reviews in women's health.
    Amezcua-Prieto C; Fernández-Luna JM; Huete-Guadix JF; Bueno-Cavanillas A; Khan KS
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 32(5):335-341. PubMed ID: 32516150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of a rule-based method for epidemiological document classification towards the automation of systematic reviews.
    Karystianis G; Thayer K; Wolfe M; Tsafnat G
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Jun; 70():27-34. PubMed ID: 28455150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A focus on cross-purpose tools, automated recognition of study design in multiple disciplines, and evaluation of automation tools: a summary of significant discussions at the fourth meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
    O'Connor AM; Glasziou P; Taylor M; Thomas J; Spijker R; Wolfe MS
    Syst Rev; 2020 May; 9(1):100. PubMed ID: 32366302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effective study selection using text mining or a single-screening approach: a study protocol.
    Waffenschmidt S; Hausner E; Sieben W; Jaschinski T; Knelangen M; Overesch I
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):166. PubMed ID: 30340633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.
    Büchter RB; Weise A; Pieper D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):240. PubMed ID: 34742231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.