These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32724803)

  • 1. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Memory Compression Alloy Plate versus Traditional Titanium Plate for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Liu J; Wang R; Wang H; Wang Y; Lv D; Diao P; Feng S; Gao Y
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5769293. PubMed ID: 32724803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.
    Hua W; Zhi J; Wang B; Ke W; Sun W; Yang S; Li L; Yang C
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jun; 189():105352. PubMed ID: 31991316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: A finite element analysis.
    Hua W; Zhi J; Ke W; Wang B; Yang S; Li L; Yang C
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103760. PubMed ID: 32421657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study.
    Huang W; Tian Y; Wang H; Zou F; Ma X; Jiang J; Li R
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Sep; 23(1):848. PubMed ID: 36071416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical effect of endplate defects on the intermediate vertebral bone in consecutive two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
    Zhang J; Chen W; Weng R; Liang D; Jiang X; Lin H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 May; 24(1):407. PubMed ID: 37217909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical Effect of C
    Zhou JM; Guo X; Kang L; Zhao R; Yang XT; Fu YB; Xue Y
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1408-1416. PubMed ID: 33942538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel S-Type, Dynamic Zero-Profile Cage Design for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Variations in Bone Graft Shape: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Manickam PS; Roy S; Shetty GM
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 154():e199-e214. PubMed ID: 34246827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine.
    Aghayev K; Doulgeris JJ; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Eleraky M; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24239024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical effect of different plate-to-disc distance on surgical and adjacent segment in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion - a finite element analysis.
    Guo X; Zhou J; Tian Y; Kang L; Xue Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr; 22(1):340. PubMed ID: 33836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical effects on the intermediate segment of noncontiguous hybrid surgery with cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
    Wu TK; Meng Y; Liu H; Wang BY; Hong Y; Rong X; Ding C; Chen H
    Spine J; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 30742975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of noncontiguous cervical disc arthroplasty and noncontiguous cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis.
    Sun X; Sun S; Zhang T; Kong C; Wang W; Lu S
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):36. PubMed ID: 32005193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study.
    Zhang F; Xu HC; Yin B; Xia XL; Ma XS; Wang HL; Yin J; Shao MH; Lyu FZ; Jiang JY
    Orthop Surg; 2016 Aug; 8(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 27627721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the effects of different artificial discs on hybrid surgery: A finite element analysis.
    Jiang W; Zhao F; Rahman WU; Dong T; Yang G
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Jan; 238(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 38102922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical Effect of Different Graft Heights on Adjacent Segment and Graft Segment Following C4/C5 Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhang Y; Zhou J; Guo X; Cai Z; Liu H; Xue Y
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Jun; 25():4169-4175. PubMed ID: 31163019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study.
    Li XF; Jin LY; Liang CG; Yin HL; Song XX
    BMC Surg; 2020 Apr; 20(1):66. PubMed ID: 32252742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.
    Balaram AK; Ghanayem AJ; OʼLeary PT; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E763-9. PubMed ID: 24732831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. External and internal responses of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element modeling study.
    Purushothaman Y; Yoganandan N; Jebaseelan D; Choi H; Baisden J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jun; 106():103735. PubMed ID: 32321632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
    Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.
    Healy AT; Sundar SJ; Cardenas RJ; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Francis TB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical Comparison of Optimal Shapes for the Cervical Intervertebral Fusion Cage for C5-C6 Cervical Fusion Using the Anterior Cervical Plate and Cage (ACPC) Fixation System: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Wang J; Qian Z; Ren L
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Nov; 25():8379-8388. PubMed ID: 31697650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.