295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32724926)
1. Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Short Implants with Different Treatment Approaches in the Atrophic Mandible.
Doganay O; Kilic E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):e69-e76. PubMed ID: 32724926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In Silico Mechanical Effort Analysis of the All-On-4 Design Performed With Platform-Switching Distal Short Dental Implants.
Santana LCL; Idogava HT; De Foggi CC; Guastaldi FPS; Noritomi PY; Dos Reis BA; Vaz LG
J Biomech Eng; 2023 Sep; 145(9):. PubMed ID: 37195691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical Stress Analysis of Different Configurations of the All-on-4 Concept in Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Study.
Santana LCL; Guastaldi FPS; Idogava HT; Noritomi PY; De Foggi CC; Vaz LG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 33600526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Stress in Tilted Implant Concept With Variable Diameters in the Atrophic Mandible: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Kilic E; Doganay O
J Oral Implantol; 2020 Feb; 46(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 31647683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of stress distribution around all-on-four implants of different angulations and zygoma implants: a 7-model finite element analysis.
Tezerişener HA; Özalp Ö; Altay MA; Sindel A
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):176. PubMed ID: 38310260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of tilted versus nontilted implant-supported prosthetic designs for the restoration of the edentuous mandible: a biomechanical study.
Bellini CM; Romeo D; Galbusera F; Taschieri S; Raimondi MT; Zampelis A; Francetti L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):511-7. PubMed ID: 19587875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rehabilitation of the atrophic mandible with short implants in different positions: A finite elements study.
Peixoto HE; Camati PR; Faot F; Sotto-Maior BS; Martinez EF; Peruzzo DC
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Nov; 80():122-128. PubMed ID: 28866146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Finite Element Analysis to Study the Stress Distribution on Distal Implants in All-on-Six Treatment Concepts as Affected Tilted and Short Implant.
Ulu M; Yasin M; Şahin O; Akçay H
J Oral Implantol; 2024 Jun; 50(3):245-253. PubMed ID: 38641913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of different implant designs on replacement of four teeth of the posterior free-end edentulism: Three-dimensional finite element analysis and clinic case validation.
Ye Z; Ye H; Jiang Z; Wu S; Feng Z; Liu H; Wang X; Lan R; Lin X; Ding C; Zhang Q; Ding X; Wu L
Ann Anat; 2023 Aug; 249():152111. PubMed ID: 37247761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effect of the number and inclination of implant on stress distribution for mandibular full-arch fixed prosthesis].
Zheng X; Li X; Tang Z; Gong L; Wang D
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 49(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 25199929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of implant-supported prosthesis with various tilting implant angles and bone types in atrophic maxilla: A finite element study.
Gümrükçü Z; Korkmaz YT; Korkmaz FM
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jul; 86():47-54. PubMed ID: 28500959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparative Analysis on Two Types of Oral Implants, Bone-Level and Tissue-Level, with Different Cantilever Lengths of Fixed Prosthesis.
Mosavar A; Nili M; Hashemi SR; Kadkhodaei M
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 26(4):289-295. PubMed ID: 26662575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Extramaxillary Anchored Implants, Tilted Implants, or Sinus Elevation Concepts on Stress Distribution in Atrophic Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis.
Sivrikaya EC; Yilmaz O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):563-570. PubMed ID: 35727249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
