113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32725115)
1. THE VALIDATION OF COMPREHENSIVE SOFTWARE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACTS ON HUMANS THROUGH BENCHMARK ANALYSIS WITH RADIOLOGICAL CODES.
Shad AH; Allaf MA; Masti D; Sepanloo K; Feghhi SAH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Sep; 190(3):250-268. PubMed ID: 32725115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design and development of a comprehensive program for the assessment and analysis of environmental effects due to the release of radioactive materials from the stack of nuclear installations: A case study in Bushehr nuclear power plant.
Delgarm N; Sepanloo K; Shad AH; Masti D
Appl Radiat Isot; 2020 Dec; 166():109383. PubMed ID: 32942086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and Validation of a New Domestic Software for Dose Assessment during Normal and Accident Conditions in Nuclear Power Plants (NPPS).
Shad AH; Masti D; Allaf MA; Sepanloo K; Hossein Feghhi SA
Health Phys; 2022 Jun; 122(6):651-662. PubMed ID: 33002967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of environmental public exposure from a hypothetical nuclear accident for Unit-1 Bushehr nuclear power plant.
Sohrabi M; Ghasemi M; Amrollahi R; Khamooshi C; Parsouzi Z
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2013 May; 52(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 23358597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident.
González AJ; Akashi M; Boice JD; Chino M; Homma T; Ishigure N; Kai M; Kusumi S; Lee JK; Menzel HG; Niwa O; Sakai K; Weiss W; Yamashita S; Yonekura Y
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):497-571. PubMed ID: 23803462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurements of individual radiation doses in residents living around the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant.
Nagataki S; Takamura N; Kamiya K; Akashi M
Radiat Res; 2013 Nov; 180(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 24131040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiological safety assessment for transportation of reactor pressure vessel during decommissioning of a nuclear power plant in Korea.
Kwak M; Kim HJ; Oh GE; Shin SW; Kim KP
J Radiol Prot; 2024 Mar; 44(1):. PubMed ID: 38507784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential consequences of the Fukushima accident for off-site nuclear emergency management: a case study for Germany.
Gering F; Gerich B; Wirth E; Kirchner G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 23287436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modelling the effective dose to a population from fallout after a nuclear power plant accident-A scenario-based study with mitigating actions.
Isaksson M; Tondel M; Wålinder R; Rääf C
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215081. PubMed ID: 30964917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstruction of Internal and External Exposures of Fukushima Residents.
Akahane K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 27664996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ASSESSMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL DOSES FOR PEOPLE LIVING IN KOREA FOLLOWING ACCIDENTAL RELEASES OF RADIONUCLIDES FROM NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN KOREA AND CHINA.
Kim S; Park K; Min BI; Yang BM; Kim J; Suh KS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30371891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SIMULATION OF DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN VICINITY OF CLOUD OF CONTAMINATED AIR LEAKAGE FROM SEVERE NPP ACCIDENT.
Klusoň J; Urban T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 186(2-3):342-345. PubMed ID: 31711235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation Exposure and Thyroid Cancer Risk After the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident in Comparison with the Chernobyl Accident.
Yamashita S; Takamura N; Ohtsuru A; Suzuki S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 27473699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL EXPOSURE TO FUKUSHIMA RESIDENTS.
Kamiya K; Ishikawa T; Yasumura S; Sakai A; Ohira T; Takahashi H; Ohtsuru A; Suzuki S; Hosoya M; Maeda M; Yabe H; Fujimori K; Yamashita S; Ohto H; Abe M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 27473698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public member dose assessment of Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant under normal operation by modeling the fallout from stack using the HYSPLIT atmospheric dispersion model.
Zali A; Shamsaei Zafarghandi M; Feghhi SA; Taherian AM
J Environ Radioact; 2017 May; 171():1-8. PubMed ID: 28160701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical Simulation Based on Individual Voxel Phantoms for a Sophisticated Evaluation of Internal Doses Mainly From 131I in Highly Exposed Workers Involved in the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP Accident.
Kunishima N; Tani K; Kurihara O; Kim E; Nakano T; Kishimoto R; Tsuchiya H; Omatsu T; Tatsuzaki H; Tominaga T; Watanabe S; Ishigure N; Akashi M
Health Phys; 2019 May; 116(5):647-656. PubMed ID: 30747754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accident Simulation Study for Nuclear Power Plants Impacting Louisiana: Differences in 2017 vs. 1992 Protective Action Guidelines.
McMahon MD; Chancellor JC
Health Phys; 2022 Sep; 123(3):218-228. PubMed ID: 35678725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. OFF-SITE RADIOLOGICAL DOSE ASSESSMENT IN A SEVERE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT OF APR1400.
Uddin GMB; Kim J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Sep; 190(3):276-282. PubMed ID: 32761060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tenth Warren K. Sinclair keynote address-the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident and comprehensive health risk management.
Yamashita S
Health Phys; 2014 Feb; 106(2):166-80. PubMed ID: 24378490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A framework for estimating radiation-related cancer risks in Japan from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident.
Walsh L; Zhang W; Shore RE; Auvinen A; Laurier D; Wakeford R; Jacob P; Gent N; Anspaugh LR; Schüz J; Kesminiene A; van Deventer E; Tritscher A; del Rosarion Pérez M
Radiat Res; 2014 Nov; 182(5):556-72. PubMed ID: 25251702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
