305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32727192)
1. [Gunsight closure versus purse-string closure techniques in loop stoma reversal: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial].
Han JG; Zhou JP; Wang GY; Zhang H; Yang YC; Lu Y; Wu B; Wu AW; Yao HW; Wang ZJ;
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 58(8):608-613. PubMed ID: 32727192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Application of modified purse-string closure in the wound following loop stoma reversal].
Han J; Wang Z; Wei G; Zhai Z; Ma L; Yi B; Zhao B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1403-1407. PubMed ID: 30588593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of modified gunsight suture technique and traditional interrupted suture in enterostomy closure.
Chen C; Zhang X; Cheng ZQ; Zhang BB; Li X; Wang KX; Dai Y; Wang YL
World J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 29(29):4571-4579. PubMed ID: 37621751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective study of 'circumferential purse-string approximation' vs. primary linear skin closure in stoma reversal.
Bains MS; Nar AS; Jabbal HS; Mishra A; Mishra A; Sharma P
Pan Afr Med J; 2022; 42():287. PubMed ID: 36405661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Efficacy comparison of purse-string vs. linear closure of the wound following stoma reversal: systematic review and meta-analysis].
Wu YB; Liang XJ; Yan HM
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 31874537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Purse-string closure versus conventional primary closure of wound following stoma reversal: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Rondelli F; Franco L; Balzarotti Canger RC; Ceccarelli G; Becattini C; Bugiantella W
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():208-213. PubMed ID: 29474885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Outcome of Purse-string Versus Conventional Wound Closure Techniques in Patients Undergoing Stoma Reversal: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ameer A; Mirza MB; Talat N
J Pediatr Surg; 2024 Jun; 59(6):1186-1189. PubMed ID: 37978002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of surgical site infections in children after stoma reversal between purse-string and linear closure.
Sayuen C; Phannua R; Chusilp S; Tanming P; Areemit S; Decharun K; Vejchapipat P; Thaiwatcharamas K
Pediatr Surg Int; 2022 Jan; 38(1):149-156. PubMed ID: 34546402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of purse-string approximation versus linear approximation of ileostomy reversal wounds on morbidity rates and patient satisfaction: the 'STOMA' trial.
O'Leary DP; Carter M; Wijewardene D; Burton M; Waldron D; Condon E; Coffey JC; Peirce C
Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Nov; 21(11):863-868. PubMed ID: 29149428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing Surgical Site Infection and Scar Cosmesis Between Conventional Linear Skin Closure Versus Purse-string Skin Closure in Stoma Reversal - A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Sureshkumar S; Jubel K; Ali MS; Vijayakumar C; Amaranathan A; Sundaramoorthy S; Palanivel C
Cureus; 2018 Feb; 10(2):e2181. PubMed ID: 29657907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal.
Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Maw A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 Mar; 3(3):CD014763. PubMed ID: 38470607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial.
Amano K; Ishida H; Kumamoto K; Okada N; Hatano S; Chika N; Tajima Y; Ohsawa T; Yokoyama M; Ishibashi K; Mochiki E
Surg Today; 2019 Mar; 49(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 30367238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Purse-string vs. linear skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gachabayov M; Lee H; Chudner A; Dyatlov A; Zhang N; Bergamaschi R
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Mar; 23(3):207-220. PubMed ID: 30809775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy for wound healing after stoma reversal: a randomised control study (SR-PICO study).
Kim S; Kang SI
Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):24. PubMed ID: 31907033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Retrospective, Single-institution Review of Loop Ileostomy Reversal Outcomes.
Zhou P; Hrabe J; Byrn J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Aug; 62(8):22-33. PubMed ID: 27564436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture.
Marquez TT; Christoforidis D; Abraham A; Madoff RD; Rothenberger DA
World J Surg; 2010 Dec; 34(12):2877-82. PubMed ID: 20703459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based adoption of purse-string skin closure for stoma wounds.
Behuria N; Banerjee JK; Ghosh SR; Kulkarni SV; Saranga Bharathi R
Med J Armed Forces India; 2020 Apr; 76(2):185-191. PubMed ID: 32476717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
McCartan DP; Burke JP; Walsh SR; Coffey JC
Tech Coloproctol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 23354904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome of purse-string versus linear skin closure after ileostomy stoma reversal in terms of stoma sites infection and cosmesis.
Ali D; Zubair M; Kaiser MA; Khokhar I; Afzal MF
J Pak Med Assoc; 2021 Feb; 71(2(A)):414-416. PubMed ID: 33819218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of purse-string technique vs linear suture for skin closure after ileostomy reversal. A randomized controlled trial.
Carannante F; Costa G; Miacci V; Bianco G; Masciana G; Lauricella S; Caricato M; Capolupo GT
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Apr; 409(1):141. PubMed ID: 38676785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
