201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32727213)
1. The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating type II from type I endometrial carcinoma.
Chen J; Fan W; Gu H; Wang Y; Liu Y; Chen X; Ren S; Wang Z
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jul; 62(7):959-965. PubMed ID: 32727213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram as a quantitative biomarker to preoperatively differentiate stage IA endometrial carcinoma from benign endometrial lesions.
Zhang J; Yu X; Zhang X; Chen S; Song Y; Xie L; Chen Y; Ouyang H
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Aug; 22(1):139. PubMed ID: 35941559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 3-T MRI differentiates myometrial invasion depth and histological grade in patients with endometrial cancer.
Reyes-Pérez JA; Villaseñor-Navarro Y; Jiménez de Los Santos ME; Pacheco-Bravo I; Calle-Loja M; Sollozo-Dupont I
Acta Radiol; 2020 Sep; 61(9):1277-1286. PubMed ID: 31955608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Zhao T; Liang X; Niu C; Ding C
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):363-370. PubMed ID: 28696169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient for preoperative assessment of low risk endometrial carcinoma.
Shen Y; Lv F; Xiao Z; Bi Q
Clin Imaging; 2019; 56():28-32. PubMed ID: 30851496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological characteristics and risk stratification in patients with stage I endometrial cancer: utility of apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis.
An T; Kim CK
Br J Radiol; 2021 Oct; 94(1126):20210151. PubMed ID: 34233478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Predictor of Tumor Recurrence in Patients With Endometrial Carcinoma After Complete Resection of the Tumor: The Role of Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.
Kuwahara R; Kido A; Tanaka S; Abiko K; Nakao K; Himoto Y; Nishio N; Kurata Y; Mandai M; Togashi K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):861-868. PubMed ID: 29683878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the standard deviation of the apparent diffusion coefficient a potential tool for the preoperative prediction of tumor grade in endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Liang X; Zhao T; Ding C; Zhang M
Acta Radiol; 2020 Dec; 61(12):1724-1732. PubMed ID: 32366108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusion-weighted MRI at 3T in Endometrial Cancer: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient with Histopathological Prognostic Parameters.
Ozturk M; Kalkan C; Danaci M; Kefeli M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2021 Dec; 31(12):1399-1405. PubMed ID: 34794277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in association with pathologic upgrading in biopsy-proven grade I endometrial cancer.
Park JJ; Kim CK; Cho SW; Kim JH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 51(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 31206949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI-based radiomics and ADC values are related to recurrence of endometrial carcinoma: a preliminary analysis.
Zhang K; Zhang Y; Fang X; Dong J; Qian L
BMC Cancer; 2021 Nov; 21(1):1266. PubMed ID: 34819042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ability of ADC measurements in the assessment of patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma based on three risk categories.
Liu J; Yuan F; Wang S; Chen X; Ma F; Zhang G; Tian X
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 29667881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases.
Caravan I; Ciortea CA; Contis A; Lebovici A
Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 28835111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient metrics for MRI-only suspicious breast lesions: any added clinical value?
Li X; Wang H; Gao J; Jiang L; Chen M
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Oct; 13(10):7092-7104. PubMed ID: 37869329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI.
Wang X; Zhao Y; Hu Y; Zhou Y; Ye X; Liu K; Bai G; Guo A; Du M; Jiang L; Wang J; Yan Z
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(28):46390-46397. PubMed ID: 28634318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of supratentorial pilocytic astrocytoma and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma.
She D; Liu J; Zeng Z; Xing Z; Cao D
Neuroradiology; 2018 Jul; 60(7):725-733. PubMed ID: 29797290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Evaluate Adult Intracranial Ependymomas: Relationship to Ki-67 Proliferation Index.
Xianwang L; Lei H; Hong L; Juan D; Shenglin L; Caiqiang X; Yan H; Junlin Z
J Neuroimaging; 2021 Jan; 31(1):132-136. PubMed ID: 32961009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved differentiation between stage I-II endometrial carcinoma and endometrial polyp with combination of APTw and IVIM MR imaging.
Meng X; Tian S; Zhang Q; Chen L; Lin L; Li J; Shen Z; Wang J; Zhang Y; Song Q; Liu A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Oct; 102():43-48. PubMed ID: 37054801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and the Ki-67 Proliferation Index in Grading Pediatric Glioma.
Yao R; Cheng A; Zhang Z; Jin B; Yu H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 47(2):322-328. PubMed ID: 36957971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiating microcystic meningioma from atypical meningioma using diffusion-weighted imaging.
Xiaoai K; Qing Z; Lei H; Junlin Z
Neuroradiology; 2020 May; 62(5):601-607. PubMed ID: 31996968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
