These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

624 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32727262)

  • 1. EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning.
    Palidis DJ; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Aug; 124(2):610-622. PubMed ID: 32727262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective preferences differentially modulate the processing of rewards gained by own vs. observed choices.
    Peterburs J; Sannemann L; Bellebaum C
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107139. PubMed ID: 31295450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Higher incentives can impair performance: neural evidence on reinforcement and rationality.
    Achtziger A; Alós-Ferrer C; Hügelschäfer S; Steinhauser M
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1477-83. PubMed ID: 25816816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feedback information and the reward positivity.
    Cockburn J; Holroyd CB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):243-251. PubMed ID: 29208491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feedback-related negativity is enhanced in adolescence during a gambling task with and without probabilistic reinforcement learning.
    Martínez-Velázquez ES; Ramos-Loyo J; González-Garrido AA; Sequeira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Jan; 26(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 25494471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The electrocortical response to rewarding and aversive feedback: The reward positivity does not reflect salience in simple gambling tasks.
    Mulligan EM; Hajcak G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):262-267. PubMed ID: 29183793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociating absolute and relative reward- and punishment-related electrocortical processing: An event-related potential study.
    Wischnewski M; Schutter DJLG
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():13-19. PubMed ID: 29481828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.
    Walsh MM; Anderson JR
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2012 Sep; 36(8):1870-84. PubMed ID: 22683741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When the outcome is different than expected: Subjective expectancy shapes reward prediction error at the FRN level.
    Walentowska W; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13456. PubMed ID: 31403188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feedback-related negativity reflects omission of monetary gains: Evidence from ERP gambling study.
    Yaple Z; Shestakova A; Klucharev V
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Nov; 686():145-149. PubMed ID: 30195974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task.
    Becker MP; Nitsch AM; Miltner WH; Straube T
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(8):3005-12. PubMed ID: 24553940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of reward magnitude on reward processing: An averaged and single trial event-related potential study.
    Meadows CC; Gable PA; Lohse KR; Miller MW
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jul; 118():154-160. PubMed ID: 27288743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual Salience and Reward Both Influence Feedback-Related Neural Activity Arising from Choice.
    Lou B; Hsu WY; Sajda P
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(38):13064-75. PubMed ID: 26400937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomised prior feedback modulates neural signals of outcome monitoring.
    Mushtaq F; Wilkie RM; Mon-Williams MA; Schaefer A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():868-879. PubMed ID: 26497268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus-preceding negativity is modulated by action-outcome contingency.
    Masaki H; Yamazaki K; Hackley SA
    Neuroreport; 2010 Mar; 21(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 20134356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Feb; 49(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 22091824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The better, the bigger: The effect of graded positive performance feedback on the reward positivity.
    Frömer R; Stürmer B; Sommer W
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Feb; 114():61-8. PubMed ID: 26756995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elevated outcome-anticipation and outcome-evaluation ERPs associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.
    Pornpattananangkul N; Nadig A; Heidinger S; Walden K; Nusslock R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):625-641. PubMed ID: 28224457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.
    Glazer JE; Kelley NJ; Pornpattananangkul N; Mittal VA; Nusslock R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):184-202. PubMed ID: 29454641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological responses of medial prefrontal cortex to feedback at different levels of hierarchy.
    Shahnazian D; Shulver K; Holroyd CB
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():121-131. PubMed ID: 30081194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.