280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32727615)
1. Interlaminar stabilization offers greater biomechanical advantage compared to interspinous stabilization after lumbar decompression: a finite element analysis.
Lu T; Lu Y
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jul; 15(1):291. PubMed ID: 32727615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis.
Liu Z; Zhang S; Li J; Tang H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jun; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 35715775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of different designs of interspinous process devices on the instrumented and adjacent levels after double-level lumbar decompression surgery: A finite element analysis.
Lo HJ; Chen HM; Kuo YJ; Yang SW
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244571. PubMed ID: 33378405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical characteristics of a novel interspinous distraction fusion device in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a finite element analysis.
Chen M; Deng J; Bao L; Jia P; Feng F; Shi G; Tang H; Chen H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Dec; 24(1):944. PubMed ID: 38057738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical investigation of a customized interspinous spacer system in the treatment of degenerative disc diseases: A finite element analysis.
Zhao G; Jiang Z; Chen E; Ma T; Wu J; Song C; Li W
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2024 Jun; 116():106270. PubMed ID: 38776646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-Year Follow-up of the Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization vs Instrumented Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Stenosis.
Bae HW; Davis RJ; Lauryssen C; Leary S; Maislin G; Musacchio MJ
Neurosurgery; 2016 Aug; 79(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 27050538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical effect of bone resorption of the spinous process after single-segment interspinous dynamic stabilization device implantation: A finite element analysis.
Zhu ZQ; Duan S; Wang KF; Liu HY; Xu S; Liu CJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(27):e11140. PubMed ID: 29979380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical feasibility of semi-rigid stabilization and semi-rigid lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Wong CE; Hu HT; Kao LH; Liu CJ; Chen KC; Huang KY
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 34980068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of an interspinous process device after minimally invasive lumbar decompression could lead to stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis: a finite element analysis.
Lo HJ; Chen CS; Chen HM; Yang SW
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):213. PubMed ID: 31092237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical Effect of L
Cai XY; Sun MS; Huang YP; Liu ZX; Liu CJ; Du CF; Yang Q
Orthop Surg; 2020 Jun; 12(3):917-930. PubMed ID: 32476282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Lumbar Interspinous Process Devices: A Finite Element Study.
Shen H; Fogel GR; Zhu J; Liao Z; Liu W
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e1112-e1119. PubMed ID: 30980982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Paradoxical Radiographic Changes of Coflex Interspinous Device with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Lee N; Shin DA; Kim KN; Yoon DH; Ha Y; Shin HC; Yi S
World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():177-84. PubMed ID: 26361324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanics and Mechanism of Action of Indirect Lumbar Decompression and the Evolution of a Stand-alone Spinous Process Spacer.
Falowski SM; Sayed D; Deer TR; Brescacin D; Liang K
Pain Med; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):S14-S22. PubMed ID: 31808533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of a newly developed interspinous process device conjunction with interbody cage based on a finite element model.
Bae IS; Bak KH; Chun HJ; Ryu JI; Park SJ; Lee SJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243771. PubMed ID: 33306706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comprehensive Review of Novel Interventional Techniques for Chronic Pain: Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Disc Disease-MILD Percutaneous Image Guided Lumbar Decompression, Vertiflex Interspinous Spacer, MinuteMan G3 Interspinous-Interlaminar Fusion.
Kaye AD; Edinoff AN; Temple SN; Kaye AJ; Chami AA; Shah RJ; Dixon BM; Alvarado MA; Cornett EM; Viswanath O; Urits I; Calodney AK
Adv Ther; 2021 Sep; 38(9):4628-4645. PubMed ID: 34398386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
