These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32728310)

  • 21. False Positives and Other Statistical Errors in Standard Analyses of Eye Movements in Reading.
    von der Malsburg T; Angele B
    J Mem Lang; 2017 Jun; 94():119-133. PubMed ID: 28603341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A method to increase the power of multiple testing procedures through sample splitting.
    Rubin D; Dudoit S; van der Laan M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article19. PubMed ID: 17049030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of random-field-theory and false-discovery-rate inference results in the analysis of registered one-dimensional biomechanical datasets.
    Naouma H; Pataky TC
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e8189. PubMed ID: 31844582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using biological data from field studies with multiple reference sites as a basis for environmental management: the risks for false positives and false negatives.
    Hanson N
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 21035245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robustness of Type I Error and Power in Set Correlation Analysis of Contingency Tables.
    Cohen J; Nee JC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1990 Jul; 25(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 26761408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Introduction of a new critical p value correction method for statistical significance analysis of metabonomics data.
    Wang B; Shi Z; Weber GF; Kennedy MA
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2013 Oct; 405(26):8419-29. PubMed ID: 24026514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Coupling between the phase of a neural oscillation or bodily rhythm with behavior: Evaluation of different statistical procedures.
    Wolpert N; Tallon-Baudry C
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 236():118050. PubMed ID: 33848619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of likelihood ratio tests and Rao's score test for three separable covariance matrix structures.
    Filipiak K; Klein D; Roy A
    Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):192-215. PubMed ID: 27774639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Power for tests of interaction: effect of raising the Type I error rate.
    Marshall SW
    Epidemiol Perspect Innov; 2007 Jun; 4():4. PubMed ID: 17578572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interpretation of research data: hypothesis testing.
    Stolar MH
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Nov; 37(11):1539-45. PubMed ID: 7211860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the impact of relatedness on SNP association analysis.
    Gross A; Tönjes A; Scholz M
    BMC Genet; 2017 Dec; 18(1):104. PubMed ID: 29212447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates.
    Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experimental and statistical considerations to avoid false conclusions in proteomics studies using differential in-gel electrophoresis.
    Karp NA; McCormick PS; Russell MR; Lilley KS
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2007 Aug; 6(8):1354-64. PubMed ID: 17513293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints.
    Chen YM; Weng YT; Dong X; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27906607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating the power of a recent method for comparing two circular distributions: an alternative to the Watson U
    Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP; Landler L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10007. PubMed ID: 37340039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.
    Blomberg SP; Garland T; Ives AR
    Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):717-45. PubMed ID: 12778543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The power of a statistical test. What does insignificance mean?
    Markel MD
    Vet Surg; 1991; 20(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 1853553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.