BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32728864)

  • 1. Visual search errors are persistent in a laboratory analog of the incidental finding problem.
    Nartker MS; Alaoui-Soce A; Wolfe JM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Jul; 5(1):32. PubMed ID: 32728864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How did I miss that? Developing mixed hybrid visual search as a 'model system' for incidental finding errors in radiology.
    Wolfe JM; Alaoui Soce A; Schill HM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):35. PubMed ID: 28890920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in selective attention and scanning dynamics influence children's learning from relevant non-targets in a visual search task.
    King J; Markant J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 May; 193():104797. PubMed ID: 31991262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
    Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition of incidentally learned visual search arrays is supported by fixational eye movements.
    Annac E; Pointner M; Khader PH; Müller HJ; Zang X; Geyer T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2147-2164. PubMed ID: 30883169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Manifestation of Incidental Findings in Different Experimental Visual Search Paradigms.
    Rubtsova OS; Gorbunova ES
    Psychol Russ; 2022; 15(4):140-158. PubMed ID: 36761717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task-based memory systems in contextual-cueing of visual search and explicit recognition.
    Geyer T; Rostami P; Sogerer L; Schlagbauer B; Müller HJ
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16527. PubMed ID: 33020507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
    Wolfe JM; Boettcher SE; Josephs EL; Cunningham CA; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1576-87. PubMed ID: 26191615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age doesn't matter much: hybrid visual and memory search is preserved in older adults.
    Wiegand I; Wolfe JM
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2020 Mar; 27(2):220-253. PubMed ID: 31050319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybrid search in the temporal domain: Evidence for rapid, serial logarithmic search through memory.
    Drew T; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 24343519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The detail is in the difficulty: Challenging search facilitates rich incidental object encoding.
    Guevara Pinto JD; Papesh MH; Hout MC
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1214-1233. PubMed ID: 32562249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search.
    Biggs AT; Adamo SH; Dowd EW; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):844-55. PubMed ID: 25678271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed.
    Van Wert MJ; Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 19304645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories.
    Nako R; Wu R; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 23796065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.
    Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):90-112. PubMed ID: 21574743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
    Thomas MD; Williams CC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of object categories in hybrid visual and memory search.
    Cunningham CA; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1585-99. PubMed ID: 24661054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidental recognition reveals attentional tradeoffs shaped by categorical similarity.
    Lavelle M; Luria R; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jun; 49(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 37276126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual search in breast imaging.
    Gandomkar Z; Mello-Thoms C
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20190057. PubMed ID: 31287719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.