These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32728876)

  • 1. Review of surgical robotic systems for keyhole and endoscopic procedures: state of the art and perspectives.
    Chen Y; Zhang S; Wu Z; Yang B; Luo Q; Xu K
    Front Med; 2020 Aug; 14(4):382-403. PubMed ID: 32728876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical robots for SPL and NOTES: a review.
    Zhao J; Feng B; Zheng MH; Xu K
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015 Feb; 24(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 25597629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Progress in Control-Actuation Robotic System for Gastrointestinal NOTES Development.
    Du H; Liu X; Sun H; Zhu Q; Sun L
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():7047481. PubMed ID: 36349314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards autonomous motion control in minimally invasive robotic surgery.
    Prendergast JM; Rentschler ME
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016 Aug; 13(8):741-8. PubMed ID: 27376789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (R-NOTES): literature review and prototype system.
    Azizi Koutenaei B; Wilson E; Monfaredi R; Peters C; Kronreif G; Cleary K
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015 Feb; 24(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 25539996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive right colectomy: challenges and clinical practice.
    Vinci A; Hanna MH; Pigazzi A
    Minerva Chir; 2015 Oct; 70(5):297-309. PubMed ID: 26365367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Developments of surgical assist robot: current and future].
    Kawashima K
    Nihon Rinsho; 2016 Jan; 74(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 26793889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotics in keyhole transcranial endoscope-assisted microsurgery: a critical review of existing systems and proposed specifications for new robotic platforms.
    Marcus HJ; Seneci CA; Payne CJ; Nandi D; Darzi A; Yang GZ
    Neurosurgery; 2014 Mar; 10 Suppl 1():84-95; discussion 95-6. PubMed ID: 23921708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Next-generation robotic surgery--from the aspect of surgical robots developed by industry.
    Nakadate R; Arata J; Hashizume M
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015 Feb; 24(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 25627433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New technologies for single-site robotic surgery in hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.
    Diana M; Pessaux P; Marescaux J
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2014 Jan; 21(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 24124162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review of emerging surgical robotic technology.
    Peters BS; Armijo PR; Krause C; Choudhury SA; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1636-1655. PubMed ID: 29442240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic Developments in Cancer Surgery.
    Nota CLMA; Smits FJ; Woo Y; Borel Rinkes IHM; Molenaar IQ; Hagendoorn J; Fong Y
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2019 Jan; 28(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 30414684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo miniature robots for natural orifice surgery: State of the art and future perspectives.
    Tiwari MM; Reynoso JF; Lehman AC; Tsang AW; Farritor SM; Oleynikov D
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2010 Jun; 2(6):217-23. PubMed ID: 21160878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
    Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current Robotic Platforms in Surgery and the Road Ahead.
    Rojas A; Gachabayov M; Abouezzi ZE; Bergamaschi R; Latifi R
    Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():39-46. PubMed ID: 33861861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [State-of-the-Art and Development Trends of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery].
    Cai H; Peng B
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Jul; 51(4):441-445. PubMed ID: 32691547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The MUSHA underactuated hand for robot-aided minimally invasive surgery.
    Selvaggio M; Fontanelli GA; Marrazzo VR; Bracale U; Irace A; Breglio G; Villani L; Siciliano B; Ficuciello F
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1981. PubMed ID: 30588772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concept design of robotic modules for needlescopic surgery.
    Sen S; Harada K; Hewitt Z; Susilo E; Kobayashi E; Sakuma I
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Aug; 26(4):232-239. PubMed ID: 28635406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Techniques and outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombosis: a systematic review of the literature.
    Campi R; Tellini R; Sessa F; Mari A; Cocci A; Greco F; Crestani A; Gomez Rivas J; Fiori C; Lapini A; Gallucci M; Capitanio U; Roupret M; Abaza R; Carini M; Serni S; Ficarra V; Porpiglia F; Esperto F; Minervini A;
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2019 Aug; 71(4):339-358. PubMed ID: 30957477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic surgery.
    Diana M; Marescaux J
    Br J Surg; 2015 Jan; 102(2):e15-28. PubMed ID: 25627128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.