These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32729916)

  • 1. Are Observational, Real-World Studies Suitable to Make Cancer Treatment Recommendations?
    Banerjee R; Prasad V
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2012119. PubMed ID: 32729916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-world data: towards achieving the achievable in cancer care.
    Booth CM; Karim S; Mackillop WJ
    Nat Rev Clin Oncol; 2019 May; 16(5):312-325. PubMed ID: 30700859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Good Practices for Real-World Data Studies of Treatment and/or Comparative Effectiveness: Recommendations from the Joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on Real-World Evidence in Health Care Decision Making.
    Berger ML; Sox H; Willke RJ; Brixner DL; Eichler HG; Goettsch W; Madigan D; Makady A; Schneeweiss S; Tarricone R; Wang SV; Watkins J; Mullins CD
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 28964430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harnessing electronic healthcare data for wound care research: Standards for reporting observational registry data obtained directly from electronic health records.
    Fife CE; Eckert KA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Apr; 25(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 28370796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing cancer registry data for comparative effectiveness research (CER) project: overview and methodology.
    Chen VW; Eheman CR; Johnson CJ; Hernandez MN; Rousseau D; Styles TS; West DW; Hsieh M; Hakenewerth AM; Celaya MO; Rycroft RK; Wike JM; Pearson M; Brockhouse J; Mulvihill LG; Zhang KB
    J Registry Manag; 2014; 41(3):103-12. PubMed ID: 25419602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness research in cancer with observational data.
    Giordano SH
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2015; ():e330-5. PubMed ID: 25993193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Special series on comparative effectiveness research: challenges to real-world solutions to quality improvement in personalized medicine.
    Browman GP
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4188-91. PubMed ID: 23071250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review of the comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or expectant management of localized prostate cancer in registry data.
    Serrell EC; Pitts D; Hayn M; Beaule L; Hansen MH; Sammon JD
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):183-192. PubMed ID: 29122446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building trust in real-world evidence and comparative effectiveness research: the need for transparency.
    White R
    J Comp Eff Res; 2017 Jan; 6(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 27759422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality standards for real-world research. Focus on observational database studies of comparative effectiveness.
    Roche N; Reddel H; Martin R; Brusselle G; Papi A; Thomas M; Postma D; Thomas V; Rand C; Chisholm A; Price D;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2014 Feb; 11 Suppl 2():S99-104. PubMed ID: 24559028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of real world data comparative effectiveness research of systemic therapies in lung oncology: A systematic review.
    Peters BJM; Janssen VEMT; Schramel FM; van de Garde EMW
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 44():5-15. PubMed ID: 27449577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Lies, damned lies ..." and observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.
    Albert RK
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 187(11):1173-7. PubMed ID: 23725614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of cancer registries in the German Democratic Republic and the Estonian SSR.
    Staneczek W; Rahu M; Beckmann L; Vyhandu L; Haas J; Aareleid T; Mehnert WH
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1982; 52(7):575-83. PubMed ID: 7165491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stakeholder engagement for comparative effectiveness research in cancer care: experience of the DEcIDE Cancer Consortium.
    Greenberg CC; Wind JK; Chang GJ; Chen RC; Schrag D
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Mar; 2(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 24236554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The critical role of observational evidence in comparative effectiveness research.
    Fleurence RL; Naci H; Jansen JP
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1826-33. PubMed ID: 20921482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.
    Shah BR; Drozda J; Peterson ED
    Am Heart J; 2010 Jul; 160(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20598966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection Bias in Population Registry-Based Comparative Effectiveness Research.
    Soni PD
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Apr; 103(5):1058-1060. PubMed ID: 30900558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative effectiveness research in localized prostate cancer treatment.
    Hoffman RM; Penson DF; Zietman AL; Barry MJ
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Nov; 2(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 24236797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis for comparative effectiveness research--a primer.
    Sher DJ; Punglia RS
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 24314338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Effectiveness Research and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: what is Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and why is it important?
    Yu JB; Lloyd S; Decker RH; Wilson LD; Park HS
    Curr Probl Cancer; 2012; 36(4):208-15. PubMed ID: 22481005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.