These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32730070)

  • 1. Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 32730070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.
    Staub A; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 29648870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The function/content word distinction and eye movements in reading.
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):967-984. PubMed ID: 37883049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.
    Cutter MG; Martin AE; Sturt P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1146-1164. PubMed ID: 31621360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthographic and root frequency effects in Arabic: Evidence from eye movements and lexical decision.
    Hermena EW; Liversedge SP; Bouamama S; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):934-954. PubMed ID: 30247050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Word recognition and syntactic attachment in reading: evidence for a staged architecture.
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Aug; 140(3):407-33. PubMed ID: 21604914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading.
    Ma G; Li X; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1409-19. PubMed ID: 26168144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An eye movement corpus study of the age-of-acquisition effect.
    Dirix N; Duyck W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1915-1921. PubMed ID: 28116701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word frequency, predictability, and return-sweep saccades: Towards the modeling of eye movements during paragraph reading.
    Parker AJ; Slattery TJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1614-1633. PubMed ID: 31524433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of a word's number of letters, spatial extent, and initial bigram characteristics on eye movement control during reading: Evidence from Arabic.
    Hermena EW; Liversedge SP; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):451-471. PubMed ID: 27893224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individuals' eye movements in reading are highly consistent across time and trial.
    Carter BT; Luke SG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):482-492. PubMed ID: 28816481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye movement control in Chinese reading: A cross-sectional study.
    Yan M; Pan J; Kliegl R
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Nov; 55(11):2275-2285. PubMed ID: 31535894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1714-1729. PubMed ID: 29672115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG.
    Kretzschmar F; Schlesewsky M; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1648-62. PubMed ID: 26010829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Older adults make greater use of word predictability in Chinese reading.
    Zhao S; Li L; Chang M; Xu Q; Zhang K; Wang J; Paterson KB
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):780-790. PubMed ID: 31380666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.
    Choi W; Gordon PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1032-46. PubMed ID: 23106372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readers can identify the meanings of words without looking at them: Evidence from regressive eye movements.
    Schotter ER; Fennell AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 31512087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.