These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32730360)

  • 1. Technical considerations for medical device manufacturers when designing gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) using the new ISO 80369-3 connector.
    Guha S; Herman A; Herbertson L; Antonino MJ; Silverstein JS; Cooper J; Myers MR
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236644. PubMed ID: 32730360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Vitro Performance Testing of Legacy and ENFit Gastrostomy Tube Devices Under Gravity Flow Conditions.
    Guha S; Ravi N; Silverstein JS; Cooper J; Myers MR
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2018 Nov; 42(8):1334-1341. PubMed ID: 29701924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synthesis of research on ENFit gastrostomy tubes with potential implications for US patients using these devices.
    Guha S; Herman A; Antonino M; Silverstein JS; Venkataraman-Rao P; Myers MR
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2022 Aug; 37(4):752-761. PubMed ID: 35165940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Design Changes in Gastrostomy Tube (G-tube) Devices for Patients Who Rely on Home-Based Blenderized Diets for Enteral Nutrition.
    Guha S; Bouhrira N; Antonino MJ; Silverstein JS; Cooper J; Myers MR
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2019; 38(4):311-317. PubMed ID: 30821589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility of International Proposed Standardized Enteral Connector for Semi-Solid Formula Feeding.
    Maruyama M; Iijima S; Ishibashi N; Inukai M; Oriishi T; Kawasaki N; Kurata N; Suzuki Y; Tabei I; Chiba M; Nakamura E; Higashiguchi T
    Ann Nutr Metab; 2018; 73(3):169-176. PubMed ID: 30179861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gravity Flow in Proposed Enteral Tube Small-Bore Connectors.
    Hurt RT; Epp LM; Pattinson AK; Duellman WM; Corner SM; Mundi MS
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 32(2):189-192. PubMed ID: 27913774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Gravity Flow Rates Between ENFit and Legacy Feeding Tubes.
    Mundi MS; Duellman W; Epp L; Davidson J; Hurt RT
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2018 Mar; 42(3):522-528. PubMed ID: 28406738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Syringe Compression Force Between ENFit and Legacy Feeding Tubes.
    Mundi MS; Duellman W; Epp L; Davidson J; Hurt RT
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2019 Jan; 43(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 29846003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased Force Required With Proposed Standardized Enteral Feed Connector in Blenderized Tube Feeding.
    Mundi MS; Epp L; Hurt RT
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 31(6):795-798. PubMed ID: 27091746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TJC: plan and prepare for the transition to new tubing connectors to minimize the risk of dangerous misconnections, clinician frustration.
    ED Manag; 2014 Dec; 26(12):Suppl 1-3. PubMed ID: 25522497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Feeding tubes for tube feeding].
    Akkersdijk WL; Vos A; van der Werken C
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Mar; 142(11):557-61. PubMed ID: 9623111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of various gastrojejunostomy tube constructs for enteral support of small animal patients.
    Risselada M; Griffith E; Kapler M; McDonald-Lynch M
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2018 May; 252(10):1239-1246. PubMed ID: 29701521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enteral nutrition by tube feeding in adults.
    Mohandas KM; Shastri YM; Shirodkar M
    Natl Med J India; 2001; 14(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 11767223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: experience in Thai children.
    Treepongkaruna S; Pansrimangkorn W; Pienvichit P; Kolkalkul J; Suthutvoravut U
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Nov; 85 Suppl 4():S1183-90. PubMed ID: 12549793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eight years' experience of gastrostomy tube management.
    Koulentaki M; Reynolds N; Steinke D; Tait J; Baxter J; Vaidya K; Jayesakera A; Pennington C
    Endoscopy; 2002 Dec; 34(12):941-5. PubMed ID: 12471535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recent experience with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy (PEG/J) for enteral nutrition.
    Simon T; Fink AS
    Surg Endosc; 2000 May; 14(5):436-8. PubMed ID: 10858466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a general hospital: prospective evaluation of indications, outcome, and randomised comparison of two tube designs.
    Panos MZ; Reilly H; Moran A; Reilly T; Wallis PJ; Wears R; Chesner IM
    Gut; 1994 Nov; 35(11):1551-6. PubMed ID: 7828971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Balloon gastrostomy tubes for long-term feeding in the community.
    Ojo O
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Jan 13-26; 20(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 21240137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic gastrostomy replacement tubes: long-term randomized trial with five silicone commercial models.
    Villela EL; Sakai P; Almeida MR; Moura EG; Faintuch J
    Clin Nutr; 2014 Apr; 33(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 23672806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic techniques for enteral nutrition: standards and innovations.
    Dormann AJ; Huchzermeyer H
    Dig Dis; 2002; 20(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 12566617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.