These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32731198)

  • 1. Examining and expanding the friction ridge value decision.
    Eldridge H; DeDonno M; Furrer J; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Sep; 314():110408. PubMed ID: 32731198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Kiebuzinski GI; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):99-106. PubMed ID: 23394968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting suitability of finger marks using machine learning techniques and examiner annotations.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110712. PubMed ID: 33601318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the clarity of friction ridge impressions.
    Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Mar; 226(1-3):106-17. PubMed ID: 23313600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How often do fingerprint examiners disagree in routine casework?
    O'Connor R; Chapman A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 361():112139. PubMed ID: 38971142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparison.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Feb; 247():54-61. PubMed ID: 25553355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of AFIS "sufficiency" in friction ridge examination.
    Neumann C; Armstrong DE; Wu T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():114-125. PubMed ID: 27111746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprints.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():89-99. PubMed ID: 27046517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The permanence of friction ridge skin and persistence of friction ridge skin and impressions: A comprehensive review and new results.
    Monson KL; Roberts MA; Knorr KB; Ali S; Meagher SB; Biggs K; Blume P; Brandelli D; Marzioli A; Reneau R; Tarasi F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():111-131. PubMed ID: 30784948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mind-set - How bias leads to errors in friction ridge comparisons.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110545. PubMed ID: 33339631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel approach for latent print identification using accurate overlays to prioritize reference prints.
    Gantz DT; Gantz DT; Walch MA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Dec; 245():162-70. PubMed ID: 25447189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the accuracy and reliability of palmar friction ridge comparisons - A black box study.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110457. PubMed ID: 33239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for measuring the quality of friction skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.
    Swofford H; Champod C; Koertner A; Eldridge H; Salyards M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110703. PubMed ID: 33524851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distribution of the Minutiae in Hypothenar Palm Prints in Slovak Adults: Indications for Personal Identification.
    Kondeková M; Beňuš R; Masnicová S; Švábová P
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 32073656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the limits of fingerprint variability.
    Fagert M; Morris K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():87-99. PubMed ID: 26197351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On relative distortion in fingerprint comparison.
    Kalka ND; Hicklin RA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():78-84. PubMed ID: 25216456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.