313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32731751)
1. Lessons Learnt (Clinical Outcomes and Cost Savings) from Virtual Stone Clinic and Their Application in the Era Post-COVID-19: Prospective Outcomes over a 6-Year Period from a University Teaching Hospital.
Hughes T; Pietropaolo A; Archer M; Davis T; Tear L; Somani BK
J Endourol; 2021 Feb; 35(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 32731751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endourologic Management (PCNL, URS, SWL) of Stones in Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists and Uro-Technology Groups.
Pietropaolo A; Reeves T; Aboumarzouk O; Kallidonis P; Ozsoy M; Skolarikos A; Tailly T; Liatsikos E; Traxer O; Somani BK
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 31456421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Stone Multiplicity on Surgical Decisions for Patients with Large Stone Burden: Results from ReSKU.
Zetumer S; Wiener S; Bayne DB; Armas-Phan M; Washington SL; Tzou DT; Stoller M; Chi T
J Endourol; 2019 Sep; 33(9):742-749. PubMed ID: 31044624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical, fiscal and environmental benefits of a specialist-led virtual ureteric colic clinic: a prospective study.
Connor MJ; Miah S; Edison MA; Brittain J; Smith MK; Hanna M; El-Husseiny T; Dasgupta R
BJU Int; 2019 Dec; 124(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 31206221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do renal stones that fail lithotripsy require treatment?
Pullar B; Lunter C; Collie J; Shah S; Shah N; Hayek S; Wiseman OJ
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28299446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The natural history of asymptomatic calyceal stones.
Darrad MP; Yallappa S; Metcalfe J; Subramonian K
BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 29675983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative Emergency Department Visits After Urinary Stone Surgery: Variation Based on Surgical Modality.
Khanna A; Fedrigon D; Monga M; Gao T; Schold J; Abouassaly R
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):93-98. PubMed ID: 31691596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Journey of a cystinuric patient with a long-term follow-up from a medical stone clinic: necessity to be SaFER (stone and fragments entirely removed).
Moore SL; Somani BK; Cook P
Urolithiasis; 2019 Apr; 47(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 29696300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent?
Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
J Endourol; 2011 Mar; 25(3):481-5. PubMed ID: 21351888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for management of pediatric nephrolithiasis in upper urinary tract stones: multi-institutional outcomes of efficacy and morbidity.
Marchetti KA; Lee T; Raja N; Corona L; Kraft KH; Wan J; Ellison JS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Oct; 15(5):516.e1-516.e8. PubMed ID: 31326329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: a large-scale study at a single institution.
Abe T; Akakura K; Kawaguchi M; Ueda T; Ichikawa T; Ito H; Nozumi K; Suzuki K
J Endourol; 2005 Sep; 19(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 16190825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Long-term analysis of safety and efficacy of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with solitary kidneys].
Wang MR; Wang Q; Hu H; Lai JH; He YX; Xiong J; Liu XH; Liu SJ; Xu KX; Xu T
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Aug; 52(4):663-666. PubMed ID: 32773797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is traditional stone clinic the optimal use of NHS resources?
Corkill J; Sale A; Gallegos C; Jefferies E
Urolithiasis; 2024 Feb; 52(1):29. PubMed ID: 38300331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of kidney stones in patients with a solitary kidney.
Yuruk E; Binbay M; Ozgor F; Sekerel L; Berberoglu Y; Muslumanoglu AY
J Endourol; 2015 Apr; 29(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 25268731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial.
Sener NC; Bas O; Sener E; Zengin K; Ozturk U; Altunkol A; Evliyaoglu Y
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 25440816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geraghty RM; Jones P; Herrmann TRW; Aboumarzouk O; Somani BK
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1783-1793. PubMed ID: 29730839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
