These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32731963)

  • 1. Reconsidering the contribution of Canadian poultry production to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions: returning to an integrated crop-poultry production system paradigm.
    Oryschak MA; Beltranena E
    Poult Sci; 2020 Aug; 99(8):3777-3783. PubMed ID: 32731963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carbon footprint and net carbon gain of major long-term cropping systems under no-tillage.
    Bansal S; Yin X; Schneider L; Sykes V; Jagadamma S; Lee J
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 307():114505. PubMed ID: 35085973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chinese cropping systems are a net source of greenhouse gases despite soil carbon sequestration.
    Gao B; Huang T; Ju X; Gu B; Huang W; Xu L; Rees RM; Powlson DS; Smith P; Cui S
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Dec; 24(12):5590-5606. PubMed ID: 30118572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Carbon budget of diversified cropping systems in southwestern China: Revealing key crop categories and influencing factors under different classifications.
    Li H; Xu Y; Gao W; Cui J; Chen Y
    Environ Res; 2024 Aug; 255():119189. PubMed ID: 38777293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agricultural transformation towards delivering deep carbon cuts in China's arid inland areas.
    Zou M; Deng Y; Du T; Kang S
    Environ Int; 2023 Oct; 180():108245. PubMed ID: 37806156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the environmental impact of crop production in China using a comprehensive footprint approach.
    Li Y; Wu W; Yang J; Cheng K; Smith P; Sun J; Xu X; Yue Q; Pan G
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 824():153898. PubMed ID: 35182617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.
    Tedeschi LO; Beauchemin KA
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36645233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The greenhouse gas cost of agricultural intensification with groundwater irrigation in a Midwest U.S. row cropping system.
    McGill BM; Hamilton SK; Millar N; Robertson GP
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Dec; 24(12):5948-5960. PubMed ID: 30295393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Carbon Footprint of Main Crop Production in China.
    Fan J; Guo D; Han L; Liu C; Zhang C; Xie J; Niu J; Yin L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36360778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing rice production systems in China: Economic output and carbon footprint.
    Lin L; Yanju S; Ying X; Zhisheng Z; Bin W; You L; Zichuan S; Haoran Z; Ming Z; Chengfang L; Jinping W; Yang J; Maimaitizunong A; Cougui C
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 791():147890. PubMed ID: 34412413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of straw returning levels on carbon footprint and net ecosystem economic benefits from rice-wheat rotation in central China.
    Li SH; Guo LJ; Cao CG; Li CF
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(5):5742-5754. PubMed ID: 32974819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of different agricultural organic wastes on soil GHG emissions: During a 4-year field measurement in the North China Plain.
    Li Z; Wang D; Sui P; Long P; Yan L; Wang X; Yan P; Shen Y; Dai H; Yang X; Cui J; Chen Y
    Waste Manag; 2018 Nov; 81():202-210. PubMed ID: 30527036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential of hybrid maize seed production in northwestern China.
    Liu D; Zhang W; Wang X; Guo Y; Chen X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(12):17787-17798. PubMed ID: 34671908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of land use practices to GHGs in the Canadian Prairies crop sector.
    Awada L; Nagy C; Phillips PWB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260946. PubMed ID: 34919544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forest and grassland cover types reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils.
    Baah-Acheamfour M; Carlyle CN; Lim SS; Bork EW; Chang SX
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 571():1115-27. PubMed ID: 27450260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems.
    Adler PR; Del Grosso SJ; Parton WJ
    Ecol Appl; 2007 Apr; 17(3):675-91. PubMed ID: 17494388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The greenhouse emissions footprint of free-range eggs.
    Taylor RC; Omed H; Edwards-Jones G
    Poult Sci; 2014 Jan; 93(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 24570444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues.
    Vergé XP; Maxime D; Dyer JA; Desjardins RL; Arcand Y; Vanderzaag A
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6091-104. PubMed ID: 23831091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of net greenhouse gas balance using crop- and soil-based approaches: two case studies.
    Huang J; Chen Y; Sui P; Gao W
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jul; 456-457():299-306. PubMed ID: 23619090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Net ecosystem carbon and greenhouse gas budgets in fiber and cereal cropping systems.
    Liu C; Yao Z; Wang K; Zheng X; Li B
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 647():895-904. PubMed ID: 30096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.