These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32732020)
1. Epidemiological Patterns and Treatment Outcomes in a Private Practice Community Voice Clinic. Thijs Z; Knickerbocker K; Watts CR J Voice; 2022 May; 36(3):437.e11-437.e20. PubMed ID: 32732020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments. Englert M; Latoszek BBV; Behlau M J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):567-571. PubMed ID: 35022153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening. Faham M; Laukkanen AM; Ikävalko T; Rantala L; Geneid A; Holmqvist-Jämsén S; Ruusuvirta K; Pirilä S J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Degree of Change and Relationship in Self-perceived Handicap and Acoustic Voice Quality Associated With Voice Therapy. Thijs Z; Knickerbocker K; Watts CR J Voice; 2024 Nov; 38(6):1352-1358. PubMed ID: 35667985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French and the Voice Handicap Index. Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e1-646.e10. PubMed ID: 30583889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia. Lee JM; Roy N; Peterson E; Merrill RM J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):515.e1-515.e13. PubMed ID: 28739333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language. Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Minimal Important Difference of Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Treatment of Voice Disorders. Hosokawa K; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Iwaki S; Yoshida M; Kitayama I; Miyauchi A; Ogawa M; Inohara H Laryngoscope; 2024 Jun; 134(6):2805-2811. PubMed ID: 38112338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language. Kishore Pebbili G; Shabnam S; Pushpavathi M; Rashmi J; Gopi Sankar R; Nethra R; Shreya S; Shashish G J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):159.e11-159.e18. PubMed ID: 31543357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of a Treatment-seeking Population in a Private Practice Community Voice Clinic: An Epidemiologic Study. Watts CR; Knickerbocker K J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):429-434. PubMed ID: 29310885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language. Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e1-948.e9. PubMed ID: 30076095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Two Versions of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index for Quantification of Dysphonia Severity. Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Lee BJ; Kwon SB J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):489.e11-489.e19. PubMed ID: 30527706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French. Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population. Kim GH; von Latoszek BB; Lee YW J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices. Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population. Kankare E; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Asikainen M; Rorarius E; Vilpas S; Ilomäki I; Tyrmi J; Rantala L; Laukkanen AM Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Jul; 45(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 30720373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison and Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 2 and Version 3 among South Indian Population. Jayakumar T; Rajasudhakar R; Benoy JJ J Voice; 2024 Sep; 38(5):1248.e1-1248.e9. PubMed ID: 35337701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responsiveness of Persian Version of Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), Persian Version of Voice Handicap Index (VHI), and Praat in Vocal Mass Lesions with Muscle Tension Dysphonia. Khoramshahi H; Khatoonabadi AR; Khoddami SM; Dabirmoghaddam P; Ansari NN J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):770.e21-770.e30. PubMed ID: 29029830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Age and Gender on Acoustic Voice Quality Index Across Lifespan: A Cross-sectional Study in Indian Population. Jayakumar T; Benoy JJ; Yasin HM J Voice; 2022 May; 36(3):436.e1-436.e8. PubMed ID: 32600874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language. Yeşilli-Puzella G; Tadıhan-Özkan E; Maryn Y J Voice; 2022 Sep; 36(5):736.e25-736.e32. PubMed ID: 32962941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]