296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32732256)
1. How patient-specific do internal carotid artery inflow rates need to be for computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysms?
Najafi M; Cancelliere NM; Brina O; Bouillot P; Vargas MI; Delattre BM; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
J Neurointerv Surg; 2021 May; 13(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 32732256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Errors in power-law estimations of inflow rates for intracranial aneurysm CFD.
Chnafa C; Bouillot P; Brina O; Najafi M; Delattre BMA; Vargas MI; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 80():159-165. PubMed ID: 30243498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-patient variations in flow boundary conditions at middle cerebral artery from 7T PC-MRI and influence on Computational Fluid Dynamics of intracranial aneurysms.
Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H; van Ooij P; Veeturi SS; Tutino VM; Zwanenburg JJ; Meng H
Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103759. PubMed ID: 32421656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 4D-CT angiography versus 3D-rotational angiography as the imaging modality for computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysms.
Cancelliere NM; Najafi M; Brina O; Bouillot P; Vargas MI; Lovblad KO; Krings T; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
J Neurointerv Surg; 2020 Jun; 12(6):626-630. PubMed ID: 31772042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of inlet waveforms on computational hemodynamics of patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.
Xiang J; Siddiqui AH; Meng H
J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3882-90. PubMed ID: 25446264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local hemodynamics at the rupture point of cerebral aneurysms determined by computational fluid dynamics analysis.
Omodaka S; Sugiyama S; Inoue T; Funamoto K; Fujimura M; Shimizu H; Hayase T; Takahashi A; Tominaga T
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2012; 34(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 22965244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics.
Jansen IG; Schneiders JJ; Potters WV; van Ooij P; van den Berg R; van Bavel E; Marquering HA; Majoie CB
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Aug; 35(8):1543-8. PubMed ID: 24651816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of aging-induced flow waveform variation on hemodynamics in aneurysms present at the internal carotid artery: A computational model-based study.
Xu L; Liang F; Zhao B; Wan J; Liu H
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Oct; 101():51-60. PubMed ID: 30099239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic and morphological characteristics of a growing cerebral aneurysm.
Dabagh M; Nair P; Gounley J; Frakes D; Gonzalez LF; Randles A
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Jul; 47(1):E13. PubMed ID: 31261117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Using Morphological and Hemodynamic Biomarkers Evaluated from Magnetic Resonance Fluid Dynamics and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Perera R; Isoda H; Ishiguro K; Mizuno T; Takehara Y; Terada M; Tanoi C; Naito T; Sakahara H; Hiramatsu H; Namba H; Izumi T; Wakabayashi T; Kosugi T; Onishi Y; Alley M; Komori Y; Ikeda M; Naganawa S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Dec; 19(4):333-344. PubMed ID: 31956175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental and CFD flow studies in an intracranial aneurysm model with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.
Frolov SV; Sindeev SV; Liepsch D; Balasso A
Technol Health Care; 2016 May; 24(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 26835725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra-aneurysmal flow patterns and wall shear stresses calculated with computational flow dynamics in an anterior communicating artery aneurysm depend on knowledge of patient-specific inflow rates.
Karmonik C; Yen C; Grossman RG; Klucznik R; Benndorf G
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2009 May; 151(5):479-85; discussion 485. PubMed ID: 19343271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Real-World Variability in the Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Shear Stress: The 2015 International Aneurysm CFD Challenge.
Valen-Sendstad K; Bergersen AW; Shimogonya Y; Goubergrits L; Bruening J; Pallares J; Cito S; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Geers AJ; Larrabide I; Rapaka S; Mihalef V; Fu W; Qiao A; Jain K; Roller S; Mardal KA; Kamakoti R; Spirka T; Ashton N; Revell A; Aristokleous N; Houston JG; Tsuji M; Ishida F; Menon PG; Browne LD; Broderick S; Shojima M; Koizumi S; Barbour M; Aliseda A; Morales HG; Lefèvre T; Hodis S; Al-Smadi YM; Tran JS; Marsden AL; Vaippummadhom S; Einstein GA; Brown AG; Debus K; Niizuma K; Rashad S; Sugiyama SI; Owais Khan M; Updegrove AR; Shadden SC; Cornelissen BMW; Majoie CBLM; Berg P; Saalfield S; Kono K; Steinman DA
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):544-564. PubMed ID: 30203115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics modeling of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a study of the sensitivity of intra-aneurysmal flow patterns to flow conditions in the carotid arteries.
Castro MA; Putman CM; Cebral JR
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006; 27(10):2061-8. PubMed ID: 17110667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm.
Steinman DA; Milner JS; Norley CJ; Lownie SP; Holdsworth DW
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Apr; 24(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 12695182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of using generic flow conditions to quantify aneurysmal haemodynamics: A comparison against simulations incorporating boundary conditions measured in vivo.
Li B; Liu T; Liu J; Liu Y; Cao B; Zhao X; Wang W; Shi M; Zhang L; Xu K; Chen M; Wen C; Zhang M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107034. PubMed ID: 35914441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemodynamic Effect of Flow Diverter and Coils in Treatment of Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms.
Jing L; Zhong J; Liu J; Yang X; Paliwal N; Meng H; Wang S; Zhang Y
World Neurosurg; 2016 May; 89():199-207. PubMed ID: 26852712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inflow Hemodynamics of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics and 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Misaki K; Futami K; Uno T; Nambu I; Yoshikawa A; Kamide T; Nakada M
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 May; 30(5):105685. PubMed ID: 33662703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uncertainty quantification of wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysms using a data-driven statistical model of systemic blood flow variability.
Sarrami-Foroushani A; Lassila T; Gooya A; Geers AJ; Frangi AF
J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):3815-3823. PubMed ID: 28573970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High Pressure in Virtual Postcoiling Model is a Predictor of Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Recurrence After Coiling.
Nambu I; Misaki K; Uchiyama N; Mohri M; Suzuki T; Takao H; Murayama Y; Futami K; Kawamura T; Inoguchi Y; Matsuzawa T; Nakada M
Neurosurgery; 2019 Mar; 84(3):607-615. PubMed ID: 29566209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
