BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32732440)

  • 1. Interface Pressures of New and Worn Standard and Viscoelastic Hospital Mattresses: A Comparative Study.
    Bredesen IM
    Wound Manag Prev; 2020 Aug; 66(8):26-31. PubMed ID: 32732440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of 2 Types of Air-cell Mattresses for Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Comfort Among Patients With Advanced-stage Cancer Receiving Palliative Care: An Interventional Study.
    Marutani A; Okuwa M; Sugama J
    Wound Manag Prev; 2019 May; 65(5):24-32. PubMed ID: 31364992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevention of pressure ulcer: interaction of body characteristics and different mattresses.
    Moysidis T; Niebel W; Bartsch K; Maier I; Lehmann N; Nonnemacher M; Kroeger K
    Int Wound J; 2011 Dec; 8(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 21999615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microcirculatory responses of sacral tissue in healthy individuals and inpatients on different pressure-redistribution mattresses.
    Bergstrand S; Källman U; Ek AC; Engström M; Lindgren M
    J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):346-58. PubMed ID: 26562377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in sacral transcutaneous oxygen tension in the evaluation of different mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers.
    Colin D; Loyant R; Abraham P; Saumet JL
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8688975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the long-term performance of a foam-core hospital replacement mattress.
    Krouskop TA; Randall C; Davis J; Garber S; Williams S; Callaghan R
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1994 Nov; 21(6):241-6. PubMed ID: 7704131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the effectiveness of assisted turning mattresses and conventional air mattresses in relieving body pressure in different lying positions.
    Wu SV; Kuo LM; Tsai JM; Lin LJ; Chu CH; Liao YY
    Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 36(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 36445182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interface pressure characteristics of alternating air cell mattresses in persons with spinal cord injury.
    Goetz LL; Brown GS; Priebe MM
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2002; 25(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 12214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing alternating pressure mattresses and high-specification foam mattresses to prevent pressure ulcers in high-risk patients: the PRESSURE 2 RCT.
    Nixon J; Brown S; Smith IL; McGinnis E; Vargas-Palacios A; Nelson EA; Brown J; Coleman S; Collier H; Fernandez C; Gilberts R; Henderson V; McCabe C; Muir D; Rutherford C; Stubbs N; Thorpe B; Wallner K; Walker K; Wilson L; Hulme C
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Sep; 23(52):1-176. PubMed ID: 31559948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pressure signatures can influence tissue response for individuals supported on an alternating pressure mattress.
    Chai CY; Sadou O; Worsley PR; Bader DL
    J Tissue Viability; 2017 Aug; 26(3):180-188. PubMed ID: 28602246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pressure-reducing mattresses.
    Collier ME
    J Wound Care; 1996 May; 5(5):207-11. PubMed ID: 8850903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preventing pressure ulcers: an evaluation of four operating-table mattresses.
    Defloor T; De Schuijmer JD
    Appl Nurs Res; 2000 Aug; 13(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 10960997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a new clinical mattress solution on interface pressure and comfort during supine lying.
    Webb JA; Chohan A
    J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(8):513-518. PubMed ID: 37572343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of contact pressures measured at the sacrum of young and elderly subjects.
    Clark M; Rowland LB
    J Biomed Eng; 1989 May; 11(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 2724940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of interface pressures in the evaluation of operating theatre mattresses.
    Scott EM; Baker EA; Kelly PJ; Stoddard EJ; Leaper DJ
    J Wound Care; 1999 Oct; 8(9):437-41. PubMed ID: 10818892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.
    McInnes E; Bell-Syer SE; Dumville JC; Legood R; Cullum NA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Oct; (4):CD001735. PubMed ID: 18843621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of position and mattress on interface pressure.
    Defloor T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2000 Feb; 13(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 10701278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic analysis of crib mattress properties on pediatric CPR quality--can we balance pressure reduction with CPR effectiveness?
    Niles DE; Maltese MR; Nishisaki A; Seacrist T; Leffelman J; Hutchins L; Schneck N; Sutton RM; Arbogast KB; Berg RA; Nadkarni VM
    Resuscitation; 2013 Aug; 84(8):1131-6. PubMed ID: 23395793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring interface pressures in mattresses.
    Pring J; Millman P
    J Wound Care; 1998 Apr; 7(4):173-4. PubMed ID: 9644425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
    Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
    J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.