BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32732440)

  • 21. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Thermo contour mattress.
    Hampton S
    Br J Nurs; 1999 Aug 12-Sep 8; 8(15):990-6. PubMed ID: 10711028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of comfort associated with the use of a robotic mattress with an interface pressure mapping system and automatic inner air-cell pressure adjustment function in healthy volunteers.
    Saegusa M; Noguchi H; Nakagami G; Mori T; Sanada H
    J Tissue Viability; 2018 Aug; 27(3):146-152. PubMed ID: 29910093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Introducing the pressure support surfaces from Kaymed.
    Pritchard B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Nov 22-Dec 12; 10(21):1427-8, 1430-1. PubMed ID: 11865249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigation of effects of urethane foam mattress hardness on skin and soft tissue deformation in the prone position using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kumagai A; Ohno N; Miyati T; Okuwa M; Nakatani T; Sanada H; Sugama J
    J Tissue Viability; 2019 Feb; 28(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 30502973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization.
    Cordell WH; Hollingsworth JC; Olinger ML; Stroman SJ; Nelson DR
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7793717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interface pressure at different degrees of backrest elevation with various types of pressure-redistribution surfaces.
    Lippoldt J; Pernicka E; Staudinger T
    Am J Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 23(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 24585160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interface pressure comparison of healthy premature infants with various neonatal bed surfaces.
    Turnage-Carrier C; McLane KM; Gregurich MA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2008 Jun; 8(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 18535423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Randomized clinical trial comparing 2 support surfaces: results of the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers Study.
    Russell LJ; Reynolds TM; Park C; Rithalia S; Gonsalkorale M; Birch J; Torgerson D; Iglesias C;
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2003 Nov; 16(6):317-27. PubMed ID: 14652518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tissue interface pressure and estimated subcutaneous pressures of 11 different pressure-reducing support surfaces.
    Thompson-Bishop JY; Mottola CM
    Decubitus; 1992 Mar; 5(2):42-6, 48. PubMed ID: 1558691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Alternative reactive support surfaces (non-foam and non-air-filled) for preventing pressure ulcers.
    Shi C; Dumville JC; Cullum N; Rhodes S; McInnes E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD013623. PubMed ID: 34097764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Potential for bed sores due to high pressures: influence of body sites, body position, and mattress design.
    Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
    Br J Clin Pract; 1993; 47(4):195-7. PubMed ID: 8260338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of a new foam mattress with the standard hospital mattress.
    Gray DG; Smith M
    J Wound Care; 2000 Jan; 9(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 10827665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interface pressure measurement during surgery: a comparison of four operating table surfaces.
    Keller BP; van Overbeeke J; van der Werken C
    J Wound Care; 2006 Jan; 15(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 16669297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of Curvilinear Supine Position on Tissue Interface Pressure: A Prospective Before-and-After Study.
    Guo Y; Li Y; Zhao K; Yue X; Yu Y; Kuang W; Liu J; Li X; Zhao T
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(5):450-454. PubMed ID: 28877111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Efficacy of a Viscoelastic Foam Overlay on Prevention of Pressure Injury in Acutely Ill Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Park KH; Park J
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(5):440-444. PubMed ID: 28877109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pressure distribution analysis of X-Ray table mattresses.
    Alresheedi N; Walton LA; Tootell A; Webb JA; Hogg P
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Mar; 52(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 33339756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of total body tissue interface pressure of specialized pressure-relieving mattresses.
    Hickerson WL; Slugocki GM; Thaker RL; Dunkan R; Bishop JF; Parks JK
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2004; 14(2):81-94. PubMed ID: 15099186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative study of a foam mattress and a water mattress.
    Groen HW; Groenier KH; Schuling J
    J Wound Care; 1999 Jul; 8(7):333-5. PubMed ID: 10776222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.
    Cullum N; McInnes E; Bell-Syer SE; Legood R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001735. PubMed ID: 15266452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prevention of pressure ulcers with a static air support surface: A systematic review.
    Serraes B; van Leen M; Schols J; Van Hecke A; Verhaeghe S; Beeckman D
    Int Wound J; 2018 Jun; 15(3):333-343. PubMed ID: 29504266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.