BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32732811)

  • 1. Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a system review and meta-analysis.
    Gong J; Chen T; Tan Y; Liu D
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Oct; 33(10):1241-1246. PubMed ID: 32732811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pocket-creation method facilitates colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video).
    Takezawa T; Hayashi Y; Shinozaki S; Sagara Y; Okada M; Kobayashi Y; Sakamoto H; Miura Y; Sunada K; Lefor AK; Yamamoto H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 May; 89(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 30716306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysis.
    Pei Q; Qiao H; Zhang M; Wang G; Feng H; Pan J; Shi Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 May; 93(5):1038-1046.e4. PubMed ID: 33484729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective randomized trial comparing the pocket-creation method and conventional method of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.
    Yamashina T; Nemoto D; Hayashi Y; Fukuda H; Okada M; Takezawa T; Aizawa M; Sakamoto H; Miura Y; Sunada K; Lefor AK; Togashi K; Yamamoto H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Aug; 92(2):368-379. PubMed ID: 32119937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical utility of the pocket-creation method with a traction device for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.
    Ide D; Ohya TR; Saito S; Mitsuyoshi Y; Hatamori H; Ikenoyama Y; Suzuki K; Ishioka M; Yakabi S; Yasue C; Chino A; Igarashi M; Saruta M; Fujisaki J
    Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2110-2118. PubMed ID: 32382886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang T; Zhang H; Zhong F; Wang X
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 32856152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Different Methods of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Wu X; Ye C; Cao Z; Hu X; Pan W; Jing J
    Dig Dis; 2022; 40(6):796-809. PubMed ID: 34937035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.
    Ide D; Ohya TR; Ishioka M; Enomoto Y; Nakao E; Mitsuyoshi Y; Tokura J; Suzuki K; Yakabi S; Yasue C; Chino A; Igarashi M; Nakashima A; Saruta M; Saito S; Fujisaki J
    Clin Endosc; 2022 Sep; 55(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 35636748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review.
    De Ceglie A; Hassan C; Mangiavillano B; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Ridola L; Bhandari P; Boeri F; Conio M
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2016 Aug; 104():138-55. PubMed ID: 27370173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shinozaki S; Hayashi Y; Miura Y; Yano T; Lefor AK; Yamamoto H
    Endosc Int Open; 2022 May; 10(5):E694-E702. PubMed ID: 35571471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection
    Shahini E; Passera R; Lo Secco G; Arezzo A
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Aug; 31(6):835-847. PubMed ID: 35112654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Ng CH; Lin SY; Tan DJH; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(25):3925-3939. PubMed ID: 34321855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) compared with conventional ESD for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    McCarty TR; Bazarbashi AN; Thompson CC; Aihara H
    Endoscopy; 2021 Oct; 53(10):1048-1058. PubMed ID: 32947624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a rescue treatment in difficult colorectal ESD cases.
    Okamoto K; Muguruma N; Kagemoto K; Mitsui Y; Fujimoto D; Kitamura S; Kimura T; Sogabe M; Miyamoto H; Takayama T
    Dig Endosc; 2017 Apr; 29 Suppl 2():45-52. PubMed ID: 28425649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection vs conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal neoplasms: a single-centre retrospective study.
    Cecinato P; Lucarini M; Azzolini F; Bassi F; Sassatelli R
    Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Apr; 27(4):317-323. PubMed ID: 36394695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planned Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as Alternative for Colorectal Neoplasms: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Zhang YX; Liu X; Gu F; Ding SG
    Dig Dis Sci; 2024 Mar; 69(3):949-960. PubMed ID: 38218733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry.
    Fleischmann C; Probst A; Ebigbo A; Faiss S; Schumacher B; Allgaier HP; Dumoulin FL; Steinbrueck I; Anzinger M; Marienhagen J; Muzalyova A; Messmann H
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Oct; 161(4):1168-1178. PubMed ID: 34182002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Systematic review of mid-term clinical outcomes.
    Patel N; Patel K; Ashrafian H; Athanasiou T; Darzi A; Teare J
    Dig Endosc; 2016 May; 28(4):405-416. PubMed ID: 26710317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors.
    Chow CWS; Fung TLD; Chan PT; Kwok KH
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1293-1302. PubMed ID: 36192659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasms: an audit of its safety and efficacy in a single tertiary centre in Singapore.
    Li JW; Ang TL; Wang LM; Kwek ABE; Tan MTK; Fock KM; Teo EK
    Singapore Med J; 2019 Oct; 60(10):526-531. PubMed ID: 30773601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.