176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32732811)
41. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han C; Sun Y
Dis Esophagus; 2021 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 32895709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis.
Wang J; Zhang XH; Ge J; Yang CM; Liu JY; Zhao SL
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 20(25):8282-7. PubMed ID: 25009404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Why attempt en bloc resection of non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas? A systematic review of the prevalence of superficial submucosal invasive cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Fuccio L; Repici A; Hassan C; Ponchon T; Bhandari P; Jover R; Triantafyllou K; Mandolesi D; Frazzoni L; Bellisario C; Bazzoli F; Sharma P; Rösch T; Rex DK
Gut; 2018 Aug; 67(8):1464-1474. PubMed ID: 29208675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Backes Y; Moons LM; van Bergeijk JD; Berk L; Ter Borg F; Ter Borg PC; Elias SG; Geesing JM; Groen JN; Hadithi M; Hardwick JC; Kerkhof M; Mangen MJ; Straathof JW; Schröder R; Schwartz MP; Spanier BW; de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Wolfhagen FH; Koch AD
BMC Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 16(1):56. PubMed ID: 27229709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of the procedure time differences between hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (Hybrid-G trial).
Esaki M; Ihara E; Fujii H; Sumida Y; Haraguchi K; Takahashi S; Iwasa T; Nakano K; Wada M; Somada S; Minoda Y; Ogino H; Tagawa K; Ogawa Y
Trials; 2022 Feb; 23(1):166. PubMed ID: 35189939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for patients with early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
Tao M; Zhou X; Hu M; Pan J
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e025803. PubMed ID: 31874864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Learning curve analysis of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for laterally spreading tumors by endoscopists experienced in gastric ESD.
Jeon HH; Lee HS; Youn YH; Park JJ; Park H
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2422-30. PubMed ID: 26423415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal tumors more than 50 mm in diameter.
Hayashi Y; Shinozaki S; Sunada K; Sato H; Miura Y; Ino Y; Horie H; Fukushima N; Lefor AK; Yamamoto H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 26341857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Outcomes for Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of 21-30-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Feasible Study.
Okimoto K; Matsumura T; Matsusaka K; Inaba Y; Ishikawa T; Akizue N; Kaneko T; Ota M; Ohta Y; Taida T; Saito K; Ogasawara S; Maruoka D; Kato J; Ikeda JI; Kato N
Dig Dis Sci; 2023 Oct; 68(10):3963-3973. PubMed ID: 37658209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Resection outcomes and recurrence rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and hybrid ESD for colorectal tumors in a single Italian center.
Milano RV; Viale E; Bartel MJ; Notaristefano C; Testoni PA
Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2328-2339. PubMed ID: 29098434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in proximity or extending to a diverticulum.
Muramoto T; Ohata K; Sakai E; Takayanagi S; Kimoto Y; Suzuki Y; Ishii R; Kanda K; Negishi R; Takita M; Minato Y; Tsuji Y; Chiba H; Matsuhashi N
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3479-3487. PubMed ID: 32671524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection is feasible using the pocket-creation method.
Miura Y; Shinozaki S; Hayashi Y; Sakamoto H; Lefor AK; Yamamoto H
Endoscopy; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 27875854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Pocket Creation and Ring-thread Traction Facilitates Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Non-experts.
Fujimori A; Nishiyama N; Kobara H; Koduka K; Tada N; Matsui T; Chiyo T; Kobayashi N; Fujihara S; Yachida T; Okano K; Suzuki Y; Nakano D; Nishiyama A; Masaki T
In Vivo; 2021; 35(3):1655-1660. PubMed ID: 33910849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions.
Arezzo A; Passera R; Marchese N; Galloro G; Manta R; Cirocchi R
United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Feb; 4(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 26966519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia at anastomotic sites: a retrospective study.
Maehata T; Kato M; Ochiai Y; Mizutani M; Tsutsumi K; Kiguchi Y; Akimoto T; Sasaki M; Takatori Y; Nakayama A; Takabayashi K; Fujimoto A; Goto O; Yahagi N
Surg Endosc; 2020 Dec; 34(12):5495-5500. PubMed ID: 31932934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Factors Predictive of Complete Excision of Large Colorectal Neoplasia Using Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A KASID Multicenter Study.
Jung Y; Kim JW; Byeon JS; Koo HS; Boo SJ; Lee J; Hwangbo Y; Jeen YM; Kim HG
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Oct; 63(10):2773-2779. PubMed ID: 29876776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparing endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection in colorectal adenoma and tumors: Meta-analysis and system review.
Wang N; Shu L; Liu S; Yang L; Bai T; Shi Z; Liu X
PLoS One; 2023; 18(9):e0291916. PubMed ID: 37768914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Double-clip traction could be superior to the pocket-creation method with cylindrical cap for colonic ESD: a randomized study in an ex vivo model.
Albouys J; Dahan M; Lepetit H; Charissoux A; Guyot A; Pioche M; Legros R; Carrier P; Loustaud-Ratti V; Geyl S; Jacques J
Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1482-1491. PubMed ID: 33398562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for early superficial upper gastrointestinal precancerous lesions and tumors: A meta-analysis.
Liu YZ; Lv XH; Deng K; Yang JL
J Dig Dis; 2020 Sep; 21(9):480-489. PubMed ID: 32579253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection assisted by metal-clip pocket creation traction for colorectal tumors].
Zhong J; Zhong J; San-To W; Lu J; Li W; Li H; Huang J; Han Z; Liu S
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2023 Dec; 43(12):2103-2110. PubMed ID: 38189397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
