These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32733694)

  • 21. Breast Density Evaluation According to BI-RADS 5th Edition on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: AI Automated Assessment Versus Human Visual Assessment.
    Tari DU; Santonastaso R; De Lucia DR; Santarsiere M; Pinto F
    J Pers Med; 2023 Mar; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 37108994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
    Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, First Edition (2003).
    Park CS; Lee JH; Yim HW; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Jung JI; Jung NY; Kim SH
    Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 17923782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammographic Breast Density in Pakistani Women, Factors Affecting It, and Inter-Observer Variability in Assessment.
    Fatima K; Mohsin F; Rao MO; Alvi MI
    Cureus; 2021 Mar; 13(3):e14050. PubMed ID: 33898136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
    Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Reliability Comparison of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Mammography: Breast Density Assessment Referring to the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
    Ma Y; Cao Y; Liu A; Yin L; Han P; Li H; Zhang X; Ye Z
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):752-759. PubMed ID: 30220584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast lesion shape and margin evaluation: BI-RADS based metrics understate radiologists' actual levels of agreement.
    Rawashdeh M; Lewis S; Zaitoun M; Brennan P
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():294-298. PubMed ID: 29673997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density Interpretation.
    Alshafeiy TI; Wadih A; Nicholson BT; Rochman CM; Peppard HR; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W36-W41. PubMed ID: 28504593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
    Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of automated volumetric breast density software in comparison with visual assessments in an Asian population: A retrospective observational study.
    Rahmat K; Ab Mumin N; Ramli Hamid MT; Fadzli F; Ng WL; Muhammad Gowdh NF
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(39):e22405. PubMed ID: 32991467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The mammographic breast density distribution of Finnish women with breast cancer and comparison of breast density reporting using the 4
    Nykänen A; Okuma H; Sutela A; Masarwah A; Vanninen R; Sudah M
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 137():109585. PubMed ID: 33607373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital.
    Noonpradej S; Wangkulangkul P; Woodtichartpreecha P; Laohawiriyakamol S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Feb; 22(2):531-536. PubMed ID: 33639670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
    Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Observer Variability of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon for Mammography.
    Adibelli ZH; Ergenc R; Oztekin O; Ecevit S; Unal G; Abal Y
    Breast Care (Basel); 2010 Mar; 5(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 22619635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
    Østerås BH; Martinsen AC; Brandal SH; Chaudhry KN; Eben E; Haakenaasen U; Falk RS; Skaane P
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interobserver agreement in breast radiological density attribution according to BI-RADS quantitative classification.
    Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Di Michele S; Tuttobene P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Gentilini M; Ciatto S
    Radiol Med; 2012 Jun; 117(4):519-28. PubMed ID: 22228132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience?
    Marino MA; Clauser P; Woitek R; Wengert GJ; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Pinker-Domenig K; Helbich TH; Preidler K; Baltzer PA
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2529-37. PubMed ID: 26511631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.