These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32733694)

  • 41. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.
    Lehman C; Holt S; Peacock S; White E; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of BI-RADS-based subjective visual estimation of amount of fibroglandular breast tissue with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison to automated quantitative assessment.
    Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Woitek R; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Baltzer PA; Vogl WD; Weber M; Meyer-Baese A; Pinker K
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3917-3922. PubMed ID: 27108300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3-5 for solid masses: An independent reader study.
    Stavros AT; Freitas AG; deMello GGN; Barke L; McDonald D; Kaske T; Wolverton D; Honick A; Stanzani D; Padovan AH; Moura APC; de Campos MCV
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4307-4315. PubMed ID: 28396996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of mammographic density patterns: reproducibility and concordance among scales.
    Garrido-Estepa M; Ruiz-Perales F; Miranda J; Ascunce N; González-Román I; Sánchez-Contador C; Santamariña C; Moreo P; Vidal C; Peris M; Moreno MP; Váquez-Carrete JA; Collado-García F; Casanova F; Ederra M; Salas D; Pollán M;
    BMC Cancer; 2010 Sep; 10():485. PubMed ID: 20836850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interobserver Variability Between Breast Imagers Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS MRI Lexicon.
    Grimm LJ; Anderson AL; Baker JA; Johnson KS; Walsh R; Yoon SC; Ghate SV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1120-4. PubMed ID: 25905951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
    Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density.
    Moshina N; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Ursin G; Hofvind S
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Feb; 59(2):154-160. PubMed ID: 28565960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.
    van der Waal D; den Heeten GJ; Pijnappel RM; Schuur KH; Timmers JM; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136667. PubMed ID: 26335569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Does Training in LI-RADS Version 2018 Improve Readers' Agreement with the Expert Consensus and Inter-reader Agreement in MRI Interpretation?
    Zhang N; Xu H; Ren AH; Zhang Q; Yang DW; Ba T; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1922-1934. PubMed ID: 33963801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Opinions on the Assessment of Breast Density Among Members of the Society of Breast Imaging.
    Zhang Z; Conant EF; Zuckerman S
    J Breast Imaging; 2022 Oct; 4(5):480-487. PubMed ID: 38416952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of breast density assessment between human eye and automated software on digital and synthetic mammography: Impact on breast cancer risk.
    Le Boulc'h M; Bekhouche A; Kermarrec E; Milon A; Abdel Wahab C; Zilberman S; Chabbert-Buffet N; Thomassin-Naggara I
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Dec; 101(12):811-819. PubMed ID: 32819886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Added Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Combined with Digital Mammography According to Reader Agreement: Changes in BI-RADS Rate and Follow-Up Management.
    Galati F; Marzocca F; Bassetti E; Luciani ML; Tan S; Catalano C; Pediconi F
    Breast Care (Basel); 2017 Sep; 12(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 29070984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Breast cancer screening: Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with unilateral mammography-negative dense breasts.
    Adibi A; Golshahi M; Sirus M; Kazemi K
    J Res Med Sci; 2015 Mar; 20(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 26109967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Scoring System to Stratify Malignancy Risks for Mammographic Microcalcifications Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th Edition Descriptors.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Choi EJ; Kim JA
    Korean J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1646-1652. PubMed ID: 31854152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
    Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA; Son EJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 23971465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. BI-RADS 3: Current and Future Use of Probably Benign.
    Lee KA; Talati N; Oudsema R; Steinberger S; Margolies LR
    Curr Radiol Rep; 2018; 6(2):5. PubMed ID: 29399419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.