These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32734541)

  • 1. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete and steel-prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction structures in Malaysia.
    Balasbaneh AT; Ramli MZ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Dec; 27(34):43186-43201. PubMed ID: 32734541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life cycle assessment of concrete structures with reuse and recycling strategies: A novel framework and case study.
    Xia B; Ding T; Xiao J
    Waste Manag; 2020 Mar; 105():268-278. PubMed ID: 32088573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental impact assessment and eco-friendly decision-making in civil structures.
    Kim SH; Choi MS; Mha HS; Joung JY
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 126():105-12. PubMed ID: 23681357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental evaluation of green concretes versus conventional concrete by means of LCA.
    Turk J; Cotič Z; Mladenovič A; Šajna A
    Waste Manag; 2015 Nov; 45():194-205. PubMed ID: 26143535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative life cycle assessment of light frame timber and reinforced concrete masonry structural systems for single-family houses in Luxembourg.
    Eslami H; Yaghma A; Jayasinghe LB; Waldmann D
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26083. PubMed ID: 38390173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making.
    Di Maria A; Eyckmans J; Van Acker K
    Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():3-21. PubMed ID: 29398268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Life comparative analysis of energy consumption and CO₂ emissions of different building structural frame types.
    Kim S; Moon JH; Shin Y; Kim GH; Seo DS
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():175702. PubMed ID: 24227998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reusing exterior wall framing systems: A cradle-to-cradle comparative life cycle assessment.
    Cruz Rios F; Grau D; Chong WK
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 94():120-135. PubMed ID: 31279388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Study on Life-Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint of Hybrid, Concrete and Timber Apartment Buildings in Finland.
    Rinne R; Ilgın HE; Karjalainen M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35055595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sustainable management and utilisation of concrete slurry waste: A case study in Hong Kong.
    Hossain MU; Xuan D; Poon CS
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():397-404. PubMed ID: 28185853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental performance of ordinary and new generation concrete structures-a comparative analysis.
    Wałach D; Dybeł P; Sagan J; Gicala M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Feb; 26(4):3980-3990. PubMed ID: 30552610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An attributional life cycle assessment for an Italian residential multifamily building.
    Vitale P; Arena U
    Environ Technol; 2018 Dec; 39(23):3033-3045. PubMed ID: 28831851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete.
    Marinković S; Radonjanin V; Malešev M; Ignjatović I
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2255-64. PubMed ID: 20434898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proposal of Environmental Impact Assessment Method for Concrete in South Korea: An Application in LCA (Life Cycle Assessment).
    Kim TH; Tae SH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 27827843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Life Cycle Analysis of Concrete and Composite Bridges Varying Steel Recycling Ratio.
    Martínez-Muñoz D; Martí JV; Yepes V
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Jul; 14(15):. PubMed ID: 34361411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision support model for selecting construction and demolition waste management alternatives: A life cycle-based approach.
    Yi Y; Fei X; Fedele A; Lavagnolo MC; Manzardo A
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Nov; 951():175408. PubMed ID: 39128521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposal of Sustainability Indicators for the Design of Small-Span Bridges.
    Milani CJ; Yepes V; Kripka M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis.
    Kucukvar M; Egilmez G; Tatari O
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jun; 32(6):500-8. PubMed ID: 24855225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of precast concrete blocks utilizing ground granulated blast furnace slag.
    Ali B; Ouni MHE; Kurda R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(55):83580-83595. PubMed ID: 35764735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing concrete for circularity: a comparative life cycle assessment of geopolymer and ordinary concrete.
    Bamshad O; Ramezanianpour AM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Sep; 31(43):55788-55811. PubMed ID: 39244520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.