These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32734541)

  • 21. Estimating the Carbon Emission of Construction Waste Recycling Using Grey Model and Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of Shanghai.
    Wang T; Li K; Liu D; Yang Y; Wu D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sustainable management and supply of natural and recycled aggregates in a medium-size integrated plant.
    Faleschini F; Zanini MA; Pellegrino C; Pasinato S
    Waste Manag; 2016 Mar; 49():146-155. PubMed ID: 26810029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Life cycle assessment as part of sustainability assessment for chemicals.
    Klöpffer W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2005; 12(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 15987002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Substitution impacts of Nordic wood-based multi-story building types: influence of the decarbonization of the energy sector and increased recycling of construction materials.
    Myllyviita T; Hurmekoski E; Kunttu J
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2022 May; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 35581405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Environmental Impact of Textile Reinforced Concrete Facades Compared to Conventional Solutions-LCA Case Study.
    Laiblová L; Pešta J; Kumar A; Hájek P; Fiala C; Vlach T; Kočí V
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Sep; 12(19):. PubMed ID: 31569478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Life cycle assessment of autoclaved aerated fly ash and concrete block production: a case study in China.
    Shi Y; Li Y; Tang Y; Yuan X; Wang Q; Hong J; Zuo J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Sep; 26(25):25432-25444. PubMed ID: 31309421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of concrete in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of US buildings and pavements.
    Gregory J; AzariJafari H; Vahidi E; Guo F; Ulm FJ; Kirchain R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(37):. PubMed ID: 34493648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative life cycle assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete: A review.
    Hasheminezhad A; King D; Ceylan H; Kim S
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Nov; 950():175310. PubMed ID: 39122019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimizing the Use of a Constrained Resource to Minimize Regional Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Case Study of Slag in Ontario's Concrete.
    Arrigoni A; Posen ID; MacLean HL; Duhamel M; Panesar DK
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(20):12840-12849. PubMed ID: 32915554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Construction waste generation estimates of institutional building projects: Leveraging waste hauling tickets.
    Bakchan A; Faust KM
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():301-312. PubMed ID: 31109530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature.
    Cleary J
    Environ Int; 2009 Nov; 35(8):1256-66. PubMed ID: 19682746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Environmental Assessment of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Using Carbon, Material, and Water Footprint.
    Sameer H; Weber V; Mostert C; Bringezu S; Fehling E; Wetzel A
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Mar; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 30871243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Economic and environmental life cycle perspectives on two engineered wood products: comparison of LVL and GLT construction materials.
    Balasbaneh AT; Sher W; Yeoh D; Yasin MN
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):26964-26981. PubMed ID: 36374387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recycling potential of carbon fibres in the construction industry: From a technical and ecological perspective.
    Bayram B; Overhage V; Löwen M; Terörde K; Raulf K; Greiff K; Gries T
    Waste Manag Res; 2024 Sep; 42(9):726-737. PubMed ID: 38628082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cost Analysis of Prefabricated Elements of the Ordinary and Lightweight Concrete Walls in Residential Construction.
    Kurpinska M; Grzyl B; Kristowski A
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Nov; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 31690050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Eco-efficiency analysis of recycling recovered solid wood from construction into laminated timber products.
    Risse M; Weber-Blaschke G; Richter K
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 661():107-119. PubMed ID: 30665127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical optimization and life cycle assessment of environment-friendly superplasticizer for concrete engineering.
    Liu X; Lai G; Guan J; Qian S; Wang Z; Cui S; Gao F; Jiao Y; Tao R
    Chemosphere; 2021 Oct; 281():130955. PubMed ID: 34049084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. System based greenhouse emission analysis of off-site prefabrication: a comparative study of residential projects.
    Guo Y; Shi E; Yan R; Wei W
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):10689. PubMed ID: 37393321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of construction and demolition waste management on the environmental impact of buildings.
    Coelho A; de Brito J
    Waste Manag; 2012 Mar; 32(3):532-41. PubMed ID: 22182407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A closed-loop life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete utilization in China.
    Ding T; Xiao J; Tam VW
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():367-75. PubMed ID: 27297045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.