These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32735624)

  • 1. Slippery scales: Cost prompts, but not benefit prompts, modulate sentencing recommendations in laypeople.
    Aharoni E; Kleider-Offutt HM; Brosnan SF; Fernandes S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236764. PubMed ID: 32735624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Justice at any cost? The impact of cost-benefit salience on criminal punishment judgments.
    Aharoni E; Kleider-Offutt HM; Brosnan SF; Watzek J
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):38-60. PubMed ID: 30474239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correctional "Free Lunch"? Cost Neglect Increases Punishment in Prosecutors.
    Aharoni E; Kleider-Offutt HM; Brosnan SF
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():778293. PubMed ID: 34867690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nudges for Judges: An Experiment on the Effect of Making Sentencing Costs Explicit.
    Aharoni E; Kleider-Offutt HM; Brosnan SF; Hoffman MB
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():889933. PubMed ID: 35712212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cooperative guardian offenders and sentencing outcomes: Evidence from criminal sentencing documents of child trafficking crime in China.
    Xin Y; Cai T
    Child Abuse Negl; 2022 Feb; 124():105449. PubMed ID: 34922261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivism.
    Scurich N; Monahan J
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26390055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public support for sentencing reform: A policy-capturing experiment.
    Vardsveen TC; Wiener RL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):430-446. PubMed ID: 33779195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring Attitudes About Hate: Development of the Hate Crime Beliefs Scale.
    Cabeldue MK; Cramer RJ; Kehn A; Crosby JW; Anastasi JS
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 Dec; 33(23):3656-3685. PubMed ID: 26951607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring methods to investigate sentencing decisions.
    Merrall EL; Dhami MK; Bird SM
    Eval Rev; 2010 Jun; 34(3):185-219. PubMed ID: 20479212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting sentencing for low-level crimes: comparing models of human judgment.
    von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):375-95. PubMed ID: 20025422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Life-sentenced juveniles: Public perceptions of risk and need for incarceration.
    Heilbrun K; Durham K; Thornewill A; Schiedel R; Pietruszka V; Phillips S; Locklair B; Thomas J
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):587-596. PubMed ID: 30298613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining jurors' ability to meet the constitutional requirement of narrowing in capital sentencing.
    Holleran LB; Vaughan TJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jul; 38(4):317-336. PubMed ID: 32291823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Juror Decision-making in Death Penalty Sentencing when Presented with Defendant's History of Child Abuse or Neglect.
    Bell Holleran LL; Vaughan TJ; Vandiver DM
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Nov; 34(6):742-766. PubMed ID: 28098410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Status, emotional displays, and the relationally-based evaluation of criminals and their behavior.
    Dilks LM; McGrimmon TS; Thye SR
    Soc Sci Res; 2015 Mar; 50():246-63. PubMed ID: 25592934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
    Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of information about sentencing decisions on public attitudes toward the criminal justice system.
    St Amand MD; Zamble E
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):515-28. PubMed ID: 11688371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications.
    Watamura E; Ioku T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277939. PubMed ID: 36409707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Juvenile penalty or leniency: Sentencing of juveniles in the criminal justice system.
    Jordan KL; McNeal BA
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Aug; 40(4):387-400. PubMed ID: 26974365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sleepy Punishers Are Harsh Punishers.
    Cho K; Barnes CM; Guanara CL
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Feb; 28(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 28182529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sentencing, severity, and social norms: a rank-based model of contextual influence on judgments of crimes and punishments.
    Aldrovandi S; Wood AM; Brown GD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):538-47. PubMed ID: 24140821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.