124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32735673)
41. [Effectiveness of digital three-dimensional titanium mesh in repairing skull defect under temporalis and reconstructing temporal muscle attachment points].
Feng J; Yang C; Cui W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 28(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25073280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cranioplasty Using Titanium Mesh After Skull Tumor Resection in Five Dogs.
Rosselli DD; Platt SR; Freeman C; O'Neill J; Kent M; Holmes SP
Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 27805731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Punchak M; Chung LK; Lagman C; Bui TT; Lazareff J; Rezzadeh K; Jarrahy R; Yang I
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():30-35. PubMed ID: 28377284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Automatic hole repairing for cranioplasty using Bézier surface approximation.
Chong CS; Lee H; Kumar AS
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 17(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 16633186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Simultaneous Closure of Bilateral Cranial Defects Using Custom-Made 3D Titanium Implants: A Single Institution Series.
Tehli O; Kirmizigoz S; Evleksiz D; Izci Y; Kutlay M; Balci I; Ayyildiz S
Turk Neurosurg; 2023; 33(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 36951018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effects of titanium mesh implant on dosimetry during Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
Rakowski JT; Chin K; Mittal S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3833. PubMed ID: 22955648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Advances in cranioplasty: a simplified algorithm to guide cranial reconstruction of acquired defects.
Tadros M; Costantino PD
Facial Plast Surg; 2008 Jan; 24(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 18286442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Therapeutic strategies for retention of cranioplasty titanium mesh after mesh exposure.
Zhao YH; Feng YH; Deng HT; Huang WQ; Xu LH; Meng XP; Xie XG
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Dec; 164(12):3101-3106. PubMed ID: 36214913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Titanium mesh cranioplasty in pediatric patients after decompressive craniectomy: Appropriate timing for pre-schoolers and early school age children.
Sheng HS; Shen F; Zhang N; Lin FC; Li DD; Cai M; Jiang GQ; Lin J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1096-1103. PubMed ID: 31088762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Technique for methyl methacrylate cranioplasty to optimize cosmetic outcome.
Sorour M; Caton WL; Couldwell WT
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Jan; 156(1):207-9. PubMed ID: 23807692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Immediate Titanium Mesh Implantation for Patients with Postcraniotomy Neurosurgical Site Infections: Safe and Aesthetic Alternative Procedure?
Ehrlich G; Kindling S; Wenz H; Hänggi D; Schulte DM; Schmiedek P; Seiz-Rosenhagen M
World Neurosurg; 2017 Mar; 99():491-499. PubMed ID: 27993742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The use of free myocutaneous flap and implant reinsertion for staged cranial reconstruction in patients with titanium mesh exposure and large skull defects with soft tissue infection after cranioplasty: Report of 19 cases.
Han Y; Chen Y; Han Y; Chen Z; Li L; Pu W; Cui L; Chai M; Li Y
Microsurgery; 2021 Oct; 41(7):637-644. PubMed ID: 34473372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Chymotrypsin Irrigation: A Maximal Implant Retention Procedure Treating the Exposure/Infection of Titanium Mesh in Cranioplasty.
Huang Z; Lei C; Zhang L; Xue H; Shen J; Wu S; Wang B; Chen J
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(2):522-526. PubMed ID: 31977700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The therapeutic effect of patient-specific implants in cranioplasty.
Zegers T; Ter Laak-Poort M; Koper D; Lethaus B; Kessler P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 45(1):82-86. PubMed ID: 27916400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Titanium mesh and hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty: a report of 20 cases.
Ducic Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Mar; 60(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 11887138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Technical considerations in the use of polymethylmethacrylate in cranioplasty.
Lara WC; Schweitzer J; Lewis RP; Odum BC; Edlich RF; Gampper TJ
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 10177458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Cranioplasty with titanium plate. Report of 114 cases].
Ban S; Ogata M; Yamamoto T; Fukumitsu T; Nakao S; Motozaki T; Satoh S; Ohtsuka S
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 1987 Oct; 27(10):984-9. PubMed ID: 2451150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Custom-made titanium cranioplasty: early and late complications of 151 cranioplasties and review of the literature.
Williams LR; Fan KF; Bentley RP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 44(5):599-608. PubMed ID: 25482456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Wesp D; Krenzlin H; Jankovic D; Ottenhausen M; Jägersberg M; Ringel F; Keric N
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3647-3655. PubMed ID: 36222944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Calcium phosphate and titanium cranioplasty after total angular craniopagus separation.
De Benedictis A; Sawant N; Marasi A; Rossi-Espagnet MC; Carai A; Luglietto D; Bua A; Randi F; Savioli A; Borro L; Zama M; Marras CE
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2023 Sep; 232():107906. PubMed ID: 37482050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
