These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32736516)

  • 1. Clinical performance of the LMA Protector™ airway in moderately obese patients.
    Shariffuddin II; Chaw SH; Ng LW; Lim CH; Zainal Abidin MF; Wan Zakaria WA; Teoh WH
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):184. PubMed ID: 32736516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
    Chang JE; Kim H; Lee JM; Min SW; Won D; Jun K; Hwang JY
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31272379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
    Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A preliminary assessment of the LMA protector™ in non-paralysed patients.
    Sng BL; Ithnin FB; Mathur D; Lew E; Han NR; Sia AT
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):26. PubMed ID: 28219323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ vs the LMA Supreme™; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Bruppacher HR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Mar; 63(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 30229857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients.
    Chan WK; Liu CY
    Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23176. PubMed ID: 35308185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
    Timmermann A; Cremer S; Eich C; Kazmaier S; Bräuer A; Graf BM; Russo SG
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LMA® protector™ in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries: a multicenter prospective observational study.
    Liu Y; Song Y; Wang M; Yang M; Shen H; Wang Z; Chen L; Yang J; Gong S; Yu Y; Shi Z; Zhang W; Zou X; Sun X; Wang Y; Fu Q; Cao J; Mi W
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):318. PubMed ID: 34930137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of second generation supra-glottic airway devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized comparison of LMA Proseal™, LMA SupremeTM and igel™.
    Belena JM; Nunez M; Vidal A; Gasco C; Gilsanz C; Alcojor A; Anta D; Lopez AE
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2016; 67(3):121-128. PubMed ID: 29873467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of incidence of sore throat with laryngeal mask airway Protector and laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: A randomised clinical trial.
    Mohan V; Rudingwa P; Panneerselvam S; Kuberan A; Srinivasan G; Arulprakasam S
    Indian J Anaesth; 2024 Jul; 68(7):637-643. PubMed ID: 39081918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sore throat following three adult supraglottic airway devices: A randomised controlled trial.
    L'Hermite J; Dubout E; Bouvet S; Bracoud LH; Cuvillon P; Coussaye JE; Ripart J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Jul; 34(7):417-424. PubMed ID: 27755181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised controlled trial comparing fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through two supraglottic devices: Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask and LMA® Fastrach™.
    Preece G; Ng I; Lee K; Mezzavia P; Krieser R; Williams DL; Stewart O; Segal R
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2018 Sep; 46(5):474-479. PubMed ID: 30189821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized comparison of the i-gel(TM) with the LMA Supreme (TM) in anesthetized adult patients.
    Beleña JM; Núñez M; Vidal A; Gasco C; Alcojor A; Lee P; Pérez JL
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Apr; 64(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 25801488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients.
    Shariffuddin II; Teoh WH; Tang E; Hashim N; Loh PS
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2017 Mar; 45(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 28267947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Gottfried A; Nabecker S; Greif R; Book M; Theiler L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28865448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
    Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-pressurized air-Q
    Ha SH; Kim MS; Suh J; Lee JS
    Can J Anaesth; 2018 May; 65(5):543-550. PubMed ID: 29524199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized trial comparing the i-gel™ and Magill tracheal tube with the single-use ILMA™ and ILMA™ tracheal tube for fibreoptic-guided intubation in anaesthetized patients with a predicted difficult airway.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Theiler L; Urwyler N; Vogt A; Greif R
    Br J Anaesth; 2011 Aug; 107(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 21652616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.