These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32736910)

  • 1. Smartphone Use in Clinical Voice Recording and Acoustic Analysis: A Literature Review.
    Petrizzo D; Popolo PS
    J Voice; 2021 May; 35(3):499.e23-499.e28. PubMed ID: 32736910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research.
    Manfredi C; Lebacq J; Cantarella G; Schoentgen J; Orlandi S; Bandini A; DeJonckere PH
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):111.e1-111.e7. PubMed ID: 27068549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing voice health using smartphones: bias and random error of acoustic voice parameters captured by different smartphone types.
    Jannetts S; Schaeffler F; Beck J; Cowen S
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2019 Mar; 54(2):292-305. PubMed ID: 30779425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of Acoustic Measures Obtained Using Various Recording Methods Including Smartphones With and Without Headset Microphones.
    Awan SN; Bahr R; Watts S; Boyer M; Budinsky R; ; Bensoussan Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1712-1730. PubMed ID: 38749007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
    Maryn Y; Ysenbaert F; Zarowski A; Vanspauwen R
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research.
    Lebacq J; Schoentgen J; Cantarella G; Bruss FT; Manfredi C; DeJonckere P
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smartphone Usage Among Doctors in the Clinical Setting in Two Culturally Distinct Countries: Cross-sectional Comparative Study.
    Nair AA; Afroz S; Ahmed BU; Ahmed UU; Foo CC; Zaidan H; Corbally M
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e22599. PubMed ID: 33970119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Acoustic Speech Patterns From Smartphones to Investigate Mood Disorders: Scoping Review.
    Flanagan O; Chan A; Roop P; Sundram F
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Sep; 9(9):e24352. PubMed ID: 34533465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Acoustic Parameters Obtained With Different Smartphones and a Professional Microphone.
    Marsano-Cornejo MJ; Roco-Videla Á
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022; 73(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 35190088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of naturalistic smartphone positioning on acoustic measures of voicea).
    McKenna VS; Roberts RM; Friedman AD; Shanley SN; Llico AF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jul; 154(1):323-333. PubMed ID: 37450331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are smartphones and low-cost external microphones comparable for measuring time-domain acoustic parameters?
    Ceylan ME; Cangi ME; Yılmaz G; Peru BS; Yiğit Ö
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Dec; 280(12):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 37584753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Current State and Future Possibilities of Mobile Phone "Voice Analyser" Applications, in Relation to Otorhinolaryngology.
    Munnings AJ
    J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):527-532. PubMed ID: 30655018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An exploration of smartphone use by, and support for people with vision impairment: a scoping review.
    Tan HL; Aplin T; McAuliffe T; Gullo H
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Feb; 19(2):407-432. PubMed ID: 35776428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mobile Apps for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review of Features and Content Quality.
    Nicholas J; Larsen ME; Proudfoot J; Christensen H
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Aug; 17(8):e198. PubMed ID: 26283290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Vegiene A; Pribuisiene R; Saferis V; Vaiciukynas E; Gelzinis A; Verikas A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3391-9. PubMed ID: 26162450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating mobile phone applications for health behaviour change: A systematic review.
    McKay FH; Cheng C; Wright A; Shill J; Stephens H; Uccellini M
    J Telemed Telecare; 2018 Jan; 24(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 27760883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Smartphones and Health Apps to Change and Manage Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Survey.
    Ernsting C; Dombrowski SU; Oedekoven M; O Sullivan JL; Kanzler M; Kuhlmey A; Gellert P
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Apr; 19(4):e101. PubMed ID: 28381394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Smartphone and Mobile Health Apps for Tinnitus: Systematic Identification, Analysis, and Assessment.
    Mehdi M; Stach M; Riha C; Neff P; Dode A; Pryss R; Schlee W; Reichert M; Hauck FJ
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Aug; 8(8):e21767. PubMed ID: 32808939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Innovative Voice Analyzer "VA" Smart Phone Program for Quantitative Analysis of Voice Quality.
    Kojima T; Fujimura S; Hori R; Okanoue Y; Shoji K; Inoue M
    J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 29801970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.