These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32737832)
41. The Warnock report. Warnock M Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6489):187-90. PubMed ID: 3926117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. In vitro fertilization, AID and embryo-experimentation: some moral considerations. Gerber R J Appl Philos; 1986 Mar; 3(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 11658827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The legal status of the embryo in comparative perspective. Eser A Med Law; 1992; 11(7-8):579-90. PubMed ID: 1302775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Preembryo Personhood: an assessment of the President's Council arguments. Strong C Theor Med Bioeth; 2006; 27(5):433-53. PubMed ID: 17043924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. IVF technology and the argument from potential. Singer P; Dawson K Philos Public Aff; 1988; 17(2):87-104. PubMed ID: 11659114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. ETHICS, EMBRYOS, AND EVIDENCE: A LOOK BACK AT WARNOCK. Hammond-Browning N Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(4):588-619. PubMed ID: 26232721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Warnock fuels debate over 14-day rule. New Sci; 1984 Jul; 103(1414):3-4. PubMed ID: 11658480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. And on the fourteenth day ... potential and identity in embryological development. St John J Monash Bioeth Rev; 2008 Jul; 27(3):12-24. PubMed ID: 19418903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Do human cells have rights? Warnock M Bioethics; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11649757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Ten years after the Warnock Report: is the human neo-conceptus a person? Sutton A Linacre Q; 1995 May; 62(2):63-74. PubMed ID: 11654679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The moral status of the embryonal stem cell: inherent or imputed? Orr RD Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 12085956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. When does potentiality count? A comment on Lockwood. Hare RM Bioethics; 1988 Jul; 2(3):214-26. PubMed ID: 11659015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Using people. Coughlan MJ; Anscombe G Bioethics; 1990 Jan; 4(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 11650881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Having a life versus being alive. Kushner T J Med Ethics; 1984 Mar; 10(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 6708064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The ethics of cloning and human embryo research. Saran M Princet J Bioeth; 2002; 5():25-36. PubMed ID: 12755101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Babies made in glass: ethical considerations. Overduin DC Int Rev Nat Fam Plann; 1986; 10(3):208-29. PubMed ID: 11649202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The moral status of human embryo-like structures: potentiality matters?: The moral status of human synthetic embryos. Sawai T; Minakawa T; Pugh J; Akatsuka K; Yamashita JK; Fujita M EMBO Rep; 2020 Aug; 21(8):e50984. PubMed ID: 32715543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Personhood and human embryos and fetuses. Tauer CA J Med Philos; 1985 Aug; 10(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 4045333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]