These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32738020)

  • 1. Multi-level movement response of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) to removal.
    Bastille-Rousseau G; Schlichting PE; Keiter DA; Smith JB; Kilgo JC; Wittemyer G; Vercauteren KC; Beasley JC; Pepin KM
    Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Jan; 77(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 32738020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing whole-sounder removal versus traditional control for reducing invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations.
    Kilgo JC; Vukovich M; Cox KJ; Larsen M; Mims TT; Garabedian JE
    Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Sep; 79(9):3033-3042. PubMed ID: 36966457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using multi-scale behavioral investigations to inform wild pig (Sus scrofa) population management.
    Froehly JL; Beane NR; Evans DE; Cagle KE; Jachowski DS
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228705. PubMed ID: 32032396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in wild pig (Sus scrofa) relative abundance, crop damage, and environmental impacts in response to control efforts.
    Treichler JW; VerCauteren KC; Taylor CR; Beasley JC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Dec; 79(12):4765-4773. PubMed ID: 37462084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa) diets on barrier islands in the southeastern United States.
    Canright VR; Piaggio AJ; Beasley JC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2024 Aug; 80(8):3901-3911. PubMed ID: 38517109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing public support for restrictions on transport of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States.
    Grady MJ; Harper EE; Carlisle KM; Ernst KH; Shwiff SA
    J Environ Manage; 2019 May; 237():488-494. PubMed ID: 30825781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cultural and regulatory factors influence distribution and trajectory of invasive species in the United States: A wild pig case study.
    Smith AL; Strickland BK; Leopold BD; Cummins JL; Mayer JJ; Street GM
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 338():117742. PubMed ID: 37001426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding tolerance for an invasive species: An investigation of hunter acceptance capacity for wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Texas.
    McLean HE; Teel TL; Bright AD; Jaebker LM; Tomecek JM; Frank MG; Connally RL; Shwiff SA; Carlisle KM
    J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112143. PubMed ID: 33631484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure of a population of invasive wild pigs to simulated toxic bait containing biomarker: implications for population reduction.
    Snow NP; Lavelle MJ; Halseth JM; Glow MP; VanNatta EH; Davis AJ; Pepin KM; Tabor RT; Leland BR; Staples LD; VerCauteren KC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2019 Apr; 75(4):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 30324708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating population density for disease risk assessment: The importance of understanding the area of influence of traps using wild pigs as an example.
    Davis AJ; Leland B; Bodenchuk M; VerCauteren KC; Pepin KM
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Jun; 141():33-37. PubMed ID: 28532991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seasonal efficacy and risks from a sodium nitrite toxic bait for wild pigs.
    Snow NP; Glow MP; Foster JA; VerCauteren KC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2024 Jul; 80(7):3227-3237. PubMed ID: 38357838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors and costs associated with removal of a newly established population of invasive wild pigs in Northern U.S.
    Fischer JW; Snow NP; Wilson BE; Beckerman SF; Jacques CN; VanNatta EH; Kay SL; VerCauteren KC
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11528. PubMed ID: 32661318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the role of free-ranging wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the re-emergence of enzootic pneumonia in domestic pig herds: a pathological, prevalence and risk-factor study.
    Batista Linhares M; Belloy L; Origgi FC; Lechner I; Segner H; Ryser-Degiorgis MP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119060. PubMed ID: 25747151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DNA metabarcoding reveals consumption of diverse community of amphibians by invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the southeastern United States.
    Canright VR; Piaggio AJ; Chinn SM; Giglio RM; Craine JM; Beasley JC
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20889. PubMed ID: 38017141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States.
    McClure ML; Burdett CL; Farnsworth ML; Lutman MW; Theobald DM; Riggs PD; Grear DA; Miller RS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133771. PubMed ID: 26267266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and risks from a modified sodium nitrite toxic bait for wild pigs.
    Snow NP; Wishart JD; Foster JA; Staples LD; VerCauteren KC
    Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Apr; 77(4):1616-1625. PubMed ID: 33200879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatio-temporal Analysis of African Swine Fever in Sardinia (2012-2014): Trends in Domestic Pigs and Wild Boar.
    Iglesias I; Rodríguez A; Feliziani F; Rolesu S; de la Torre A
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2017 Apr; 64(2):656-662. PubMed ID: 26392004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Niche conservatism and the invasive potential of the wild boar.
    Sales LP; Ribeiro BR; Hayward MW; Paglia A; Passamani M; Loyola R
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Sep; 86(5):1214-1223. PubMed ID: 28656732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Food resources affect territoriality of invasive wild pig sounders with implications for control.
    Kilgo JC; Garabedian JE; Vukovich M; Schlichting PE; Byrne ME; Beasley JC
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18821. PubMed ID: 34552124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting functional responses in agro-ecosystems from animal movement data to improve management of invasive pests.
    Wilber MQ; Chinn SM; Beasley JC; Boughton RK; Brook RK; Ditchkoff SS; Fischer JW; Hartley SB; Holmstrom LK; Kilgo JC; Lewis JS; Miller RS; Snow NP; VerCauteren KC; Wisely SM; Webb CT; Pepin KM
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Jan; 30(1):e02015. PubMed ID: 31596984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.