300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32738549)
1. Relationship between robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy in the learning curve of a single surgeon as a novice in radical prostatectomy: A retrospective cohort study.
Song W; Lee SW; Chung JH; Kang M; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Jeon SS
Int J Surg; 2020 Sep; 81():74-79. PubMed ID: 32738549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].
Otsuki H; Kuwahara Y; Nakamura K; Tsukamoto T
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Sep; 104(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 24187850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update.
Tang K; Jiang K; Chen H; Chen Z; Xu H; Ye Z
Oncotarget; 2017 May; 8(19):32237-32257. PubMed ID: 27852051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Critical Analysis of the Learning Curve and Postlearning Curve Outcomes of Two Experience- and Volume-Matched Surgeons for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Good DW; Stewart GD; Laird A; Stolzenburg JU; Cahill D; McNeill SA
J Endourol; 2015 Aug; 29(8):939-47. PubMed ID: 25630790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.
Park J; Yoo DS; Song C; Park S; Park S; Kim SC; Cho Y; Ahn H
World J Urol; 2014 Feb; 32(1):193-9. PubMed ID: 24062092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.
Lee D; Choi SK; Park J; Shim M; Kim A; Lee S; Song C; Ahn H
Korean J Urol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):572-9. PubMed ID: 26279826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer?
Punnen S; Meng MV; Cooperberg MR; Greene KL; Cowan JE; Carroll PR
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E314-20. PubMed ID: 23451984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies].
Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV
Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.
Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel MB; Orvieto MA; Chauhan S; Ficarra V; Melegari S; Palmer KJ; Patel VR
J Endourol; 2010 Dec; 24(12):2003-15. PubMed ID: 20942686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic radical prostatectomy: difficult to start, fast to improve? Influence of surgical experience in robotic and open radical prostatectomy.
Baunacke M; Azawia A; Huber J; Groeben C; Thomas C; Borkowetz A
World J Urol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):4311-4317. PubMed ID: 34272595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA
Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ficarra V; Novara G; Rosen RC; Artibani W; Carroll PR; Costello A; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel VR; Stolzenburg JU; Van der Poel H; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Mottrie A
Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 22749852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.
Rocco B; Matei DV; Melegari S; Ospina JC; Mazzoleni F; Errico G; Mastropasqua M; Santoro L; Detti S; de Cobelli O
BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(7):991-5. PubMed ID: 19426191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes and Complications According to Surgical Approach to Radical Prostatectomy: Special Focus on the Perineal Approach.
Song W; Park JH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Aug; 15(4):e645-e652. PubMed ID: 28216277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adding a newly trained surgeon into a high-volume robotic prostatectomy group: are outcomes compromised?
Wang L; Diaz M; Stricker H; Peabody JO; Menon M; Rogers CG
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 27350553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
