111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32738754)
1. Assessing the impact of using conventional swabs on the ANDE 6C arrestee biochip.
Manzella AM; Moreno LI
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102358. PubMed ID: 32738754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the ANDE 6C Rapid DNA system and investigative biochip for the processing of calcified and muscle tissue.
Manzella AM; Carte KM; King SL; Moreno LI
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102526. PubMed ID: 33991866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developmental validation of the ANDE™ rapid DNA system with FlexPlex™ assay for arrestee and reference buccal swab processing and database searching.
Carney C; Whitney S; Vaidyanathan J; Persick R; Noel F; Vallone PM; Romsos EL; Tan E; Grover R; Turingan RS; French JL; Selden RF
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():120-130. PubMed ID: 30818156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods.
Ragazzo M; Melchiorri S; Manzo L; Errichiello V; Puleri G; Nicastro F; Giardina E
Genes (Basel); 2020 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 32456006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developmental Validation of the ANDE 6C System for Rapid DNA Analysis of Forensic Casework and DVI Samples.
Turingan RS; Tan E; Jiang H; Brown J; Estari Y; Krautz-Peterson G; Selden RF
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1056-1071. PubMed ID: 32040208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Internal validation of the DNAscan/ANDE™ Rapid DNA Analysis™ platform and its associated PowerPlex
Moreno LI; Brown AL; Callaghan TF
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():100-108. PubMed ID: 28399438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internal validation of the RapidHIT
Wiley R; Sage K; LaRue B; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():180-188. PubMed ID: 29055861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of two Rapid DNA technologies for the processing of blood and saliva-based samples.
Laurin N; Boulianne H; Frégeau C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Nov; 67():102928. PubMed ID: 37573630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developmental validation of the DNAscan™ Rapid DNA Analysis™ instrument and expert system for reference sample processing.
Della Manna A; Nye JV; Carney C; Hammons JS; Mann M; Al Shamali F; Vallone PM; Romsos EL; Marne BA; Tan E; Turingan RS; Hogan C; Selden RF; French JL
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():145-156. PubMed ID: 27606570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A practical study on direct PCR amplification using the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit on human bloodstains collected with microFLOQ™ Direct swabs.
Chong KWY; Wong Y; Ng BK; Lim WSH; Rosli AR; Syn CKC
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():43-50. PubMed ID: 31075566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visualising latent DNA on swabs.
Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride P; Linacre A
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():115-123. PubMed ID: 30195152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs.
Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids.
Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N
J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
Nori DV; McCord BR
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Sep; 407(23):6975-84. PubMed ID: 26055880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of the 2018 Rapid DNA Maturity Assessment.
Romsos EL; French JL; Smith M; Figarelli V; Harran F; Vandegrift G; Moreno LI; Callaghan TF; Brocato J; Vaidyanathan J; Pedroso JC; Amy A; Stoiloff S; Morillo VH; Czetyrko K; Johnson ED; de Tagyos J; Murray A; Vallone PM
J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):953-959. PubMed ID: 31985834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
Pang BC; Cheung BK
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
