These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32738754)

  • 21. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative study of Rapid DNA versus conventional methods on compromised bones.
    Date Chong M; Sheehan S; Battaglia J; Wescott DJ; Wallin J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Mar; 63():102825. PubMed ID: 36592573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Touch DNA recovery from vehicle surfaces using different swabs.
    Giovanelli A; Grazinoli Garrido R; Rocha A; Hessab T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):707-711. PubMed ID: 34725823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Direct PCR Amplification Using Various Swabs and Washing Reagents.
    Altshuler H; Roy R
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1542-52. PubMed ID: 26331283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of sample degradation and inhibition on field-based DNA identification of human remains.
    Dawnay N; Flamson R; Hall MJR; Steadman DW
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():46-53. PubMed ID: 30077890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors affecting DNA recovery from cartridge cases.
    Jansson L; Forsberg C; Akel Y; Dufva C; Ansell C; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102343. PubMed ID: 32683317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of Rapid DNA system for buccal swab and disaster victim identification samples.
    Kitayama T; Fukagawa T; Watahiki H; Mita Y; Fujii K; Unuma K; Sakurada K; Uemura K; Sekiguchi K; Mizuno N
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Sep; 46():101713. PubMed ID: 32442862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.
    Sherier AJ; Kieser RE; Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; King JL; Woerner AE; Ambers A; Garofano P; Budowle B
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 31165261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigation into ethylene oxide treatment and residuals on DNA and downstream DNA analysis.
    Wilson-Wilde L; Yakovchyts D; Neville S; Maynard P; Gunn P
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 28063580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Effect of the type of swab on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Giovannini N; Suárez de Basnec MC; Zapata M
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 1991; 23(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 1815280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples.
    Liu JY
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CaseSolver: An investigative open source expert system based on EuroForMix.
    Bleka Ø; Prieto L; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():83-92. PubMed ID: 31031230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Developmental validation of a fully integrated sample-to-profile rapid human identification system for processing single-source reference buccal samples.
    Jovanovich S; Bogdan G; Belcinski R; Buscaino J; Burgi D; Butts ELR; Chear K; Ciopyk B; Eberhart D; El-Sissi O; Franklin H; Gangano S; Gass J; Harris D; Hennessy L; Kindwall A; King D; Klevenberg J; Li Y; Mehendale N; McIntosh R; Nielsen B; Park C; Pearson F; Schueren R; Stainton N; Troup C; Vallone PM; Vangbo M; Woudenberg T; Wyrick D; Williams S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():181-194. PubMed ID: 25621924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development and validation of the RapidHIT™ 200 utilising NGMSElect™ Express for the processing of buccal swabs.
    Shackleton D; Pagram J; Ives L; Vanhinsbergh D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():244-252. PubMed ID: 29908518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. FlexPlex27-highly multiplexed rapid DNA identification for law enforcement, kinship, and military applications.
    Grover R; Jiang H; Turingan RS; French JL; Tan E; Selden RF
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Nov; 131(6):1489-1501. PubMed ID: 28258488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrostatic sampling of trace DNA from clothing.
    Zieger M; Defaux PM; Utz S
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 26753871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of swab types & elution buffers for collection and analysis of intact cells to aid in deconvolution of complex DNA mixtures.
    Canfield JR; Jollie M; Worst T; Oechsle C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Nov; 340():111448. PubMed ID: 36087371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Feasibility of using alternative swabs and storage solutions for paired SARS-CoV-2 detection and microbiome analysis in the hospital environment.
    Minich JJ; Ali F; Marotz C; Belda-Ferre P; Chiang L; Shaffer JP; Carpenter CS; McDonald D; Gilbert J; Allard SM; Allen EE; Knight R; Sweeney DA; Swafford AD
    Microbiome; 2021 Jan; 9(1):25. PubMed ID: 33482920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Direct PCR Improves the Recovery of DNA from Various Substrates.
    Templeton JE; Taylor D; Handt O; Skuza P; Linacre A
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1558-62. PubMed ID: 26264133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.