These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3273884)

  • 1. Absorbed dose comparison among commercial ionization chambers in polystyrene and acrylic phantoms.
    Kubo H; Cheng P
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 3273884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39.
    Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of plastic protective caps on the calibration of therapy beams in water.
    Hanson WF; Tinoco JA
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 4000086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
    Huq MS; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Results of photon absorbed-dose measurements using the AAPM TG-21 protocol for accelerating potentials up to 26 MV.
    Hazle JD; Kirby TH; Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1234-6. PubMed ID: 1753909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the recommendations of the TG-25 protocol for determination of depth dose curves for electron beams using ionization chambers.
    Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1333-7. PubMed ID: 7476721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.
    Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams.
    Almond PR; Xu Z; Li H; Park HC
    Med Phys; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1307-14. PubMed ID: 7476718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correction factors for Farmer-type chambers for absorbed dose determination in 60Co and 192Ir brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Tölli H; Johansson KA
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3171-81. PubMed ID: 9832009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verification of absorbed doses determined with thimble and parallel-plate ionization chambers in clinical electron beams using ferrous sulphate dosimetry.
    Van der Plaetsen A; Seuntjens J; Thierens H; Vynckier S
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8164587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small-beam calibration by 0.6- and 0.2-cm3 ionization chambers.
    Engler MJ; Jones GL
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):822-6. PubMed ID: 6439992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wall correction factors for calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers with high-energy photon beams.
    Araki F; Ikeda R; Shirakawa Y; Shimonobou T; Moribe N; Takada T; Takahashi M; Oura H; Matoba M
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2509-17. PubMed ID: 11008952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calibration of photon and electron beams with an extrapolation chamber.
    Zankowski CE; Podgorsak EB
    Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 9127299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fraction of ionization from electrons arising in the wall of an ionization chamber.
    Lempert GD; Nath R; Schulz RJ
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 6405142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examination of the factors Ac and Aeq for cylindrical ion chambers used in cobalt-60 beams.
    Holt JG; Fleischman RC; Perry DJ; Buffa A
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 481354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons of electron beam dose measurements in water and polystyrene using various dosimeters.
    Kase KR; Adler GJ; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6804767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 2: The PTW/MARKUS chamber.
    Cross P; Freeman N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Jun; 20(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 9262032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
    Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.