BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32739496)

  • 1. Adaptive design implementation in confirmatory trials: methods, practical considerations and case studies.
    Li Q; Lin J; Lin Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Nov; 98():106096. PubMed ID: 32739496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive designs in clinical trials: from scientific advice to marketing authorisation to the European Medicine Agency.
    Collignon O; Koenig F; Koch A; Hemmings RJ; Pétavy F; Saint-Raymond A; Papaluca-Amati M; Posch M
    Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):642. PubMed ID: 30454061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regulatory perspectives on multiplicity in adaptive design clinical trials throughout a drug development program.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM; O'Neill R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):846-59. PubMed ID: 21516573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Paradigms for adaptive statistical information designs: practical experiences and strategies.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM; O'Neill R
    Stat Med; 2012 Nov; 31(25):3011-23. PubMed ID: 22927234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive Design: A Review of the Technical, Statistical, and Regulatory Aspects of Implementation in a Clinical Trial.
    Cerqueira FP; Jesus AMC; Cotrim MD
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2020 Jan; 54(1):246-258. PubMed ID: 32008232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An adaptive seamless Phase 2-3 design with multiple endpoints.
    Jin M; Zhang P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):1143-1151. PubMed ID: 33588655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical characteristics of adaptive design in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.
    Sato A; Shimura M; Gosho M
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2018 Apr; 43(2):170-180. PubMed ID: 28850685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: applications and practical considerations.
    Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine A; Maurer W
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 16972715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study.
    Connor JT; Broglio KR; Durkalski V; Meurer WJ; Johnston KC
    Trials; 2015 Mar; 16():72. PubMed ID: 25885963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interim decision making in seamless trial designs: An application in an adaptive dose-finding study in a rare kidney disease.
    Papachristofi O; Bornkamp B; Wright M; Friede T
    Pharm Stat; 2024; 23(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 37691560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive seamless clinical trials using early outcomes for treatment or subgroup selection: Methods, simulation model and their implementation in R.
    Friede T; Stallard N; Parsons N
    Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1264-1283. PubMed ID: 32118317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An objective re-evaluation of adaptive sample size re-estimation: commentary on 'Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs'.
    Mehta C; Liu L
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(3):350-8. PubMed ID: 26757953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of two-stage designs of Phase 2 single-arm trials in glioblastoma: a systematic review.
    Yoo W; Kim S; Garcia M; Mehta S; Sanai N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):327. PubMed ID: 36550391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive designs at European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) with a focus on adaptive sample size re-estimation based on interim-effect size.
    Mauer M; Collette L; Bogaerts J;
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Jun; 48(9):1386-91. PubMed ID: 22281098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive Clinical Trials: Overview of Phase III Designs and Challenges.
    Maca J; Dragalin V; Gallo P
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2014 Jan; 48(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30231417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal seamless phase 2/3 oncology trial designs based on Probability of Success (PoS).
    Teng Z; Liang L; Liu G; Liu Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4097-4113. PubMed ID: 30084110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible seamless 2-in-1 design with sample size adaptation.
    Li R; Wu L; Liu R; Lin J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Mar; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 38549502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: general concepts.
    Bretz F; Schmidli H; König F; Racine A; Maurer W
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):623-34. PubMed ID: 16972714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 2-in-1 adaptive phase 2/3 design for expedited oncology drug development.
    Chen C; Anderson K; Mehrotra DV; Rubin EH; Tse A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2018 Jan; 64():238-242. PubMed ID: 28966137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive group sequential survival comparisons based on log-rank and pointwise test statistics.
    Feld J; Faldum A; Schmidt R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2562-2581. PubMed ID: 34641702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.