BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32740806)

  • 21. Early biochemical recurrence, urinary continence and potency outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Hvarness H; Christensen IJ; Iversen P
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Aug; 48(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 24579803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing.
    Tewari AK; Ali A; Metgud S; Theckumparampil N; Srivastava A; Khani F; Robinson BD; Gumpeni N; Shevchuk MM; Durand M; Sooriakumaran P; Li J; Leung R; Peyser A; Gruschow S; Asija V; Harneja N
    World J Urol; 2013 Jun; 31(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 23354288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study.
    Mirmilstein G; Rai BP; Gbolahan O; Srirangam V; Narula A; Agarwal S; Lane TM; Vasdev N; Adshead J
    BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):854-862. PubMed ID: 29124889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrospective Concomitant Nonrandomized Comparison of "Touch" Cautery Versus Athermal Dissection of the Prostatic Vascular Pedicles and Neurovascular Bundles During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Hofmann M; Huang E; Huynh LM; Kaler K; Vernez S; Gordon A; Morales B; Skarecky D; Ahlering TE
    Eur Urol; 2022 Jan; 81(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 34384621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopic vs open retropubic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: surgical and functional outcomes in 300 patients.
    Greco F; Wagner S; Hoda MR; Kawan F; Inferrera A; Lupo A; Reichelt O; Jurczok A; Hamza A; Fornara P
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):543-7. PubMed ID: 20067455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The role of waterjet dissection in improving erectile function and continence after nerve-sparing prostatectomy].
    Glybochko PV; Alyaev YG; Rapoport LM; Grigorev NA; Bezrukov EA; Tsarichenko DG; Sirota ES; Martirosyan GA
    Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28394522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing sural nerve interposition grafting during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Zorn KC; Bernstein AJ; Gofrit ON; Shikanov SA; Mikhail AA; Song DH; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
    J Endourol; 2008 May; 22(5):1005-12. PubMed ID: 18419333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Oncologic outcomes of patients with incidental prostate cancer who underwent RARC: a comparison between nerve sparing and non-nerve sparing approach.
    Chessa F; Möller A; Collins J; Laurin O; Aly M; Schiavina R; Adding C; Distefano C; Akre O; Bertaccini A; Hosseini A; Brunocilla E; Wiklund P
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):105-114. PubMed ID: 32367438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer.
    Nyarangi-Dix JN; Görtz M; Gradinarov G; Hofer L; Schütz V; Gasch C; Radtke JP; Hohenfellner M
    BMC Urol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):113. PubMed ID: 31718600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modified Apical Dissection and Lateral Prostatic Fascia Preservation Improves Early Postoperative Functional Recovery in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Propensity Score-matched Analysis.
    Covas Moschovas M; Bhat S; Onol FF; Rogers T; Roof S; Mazzone E; Mottrie A; Patel V
    Eur Urol; 2020 Dec; 78(6):875-884. PubMed ID: 32593529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does intrafascial dissection during nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compromise cancer control?
    Neill MG; Louie-Johnsun M; Chabert C; Eden C
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1730-3. PubMed ID: 20063449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of preoperative erectile function and nerve-sparing procedure as predictors.
    Takenaka A; Soga H; Kurahashi T; Miyake H; Tanaka K; Fujisawa M
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2009; 41(3):587-93. PubMed ID: 18810650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection does not affect erectile function recovery in patients treated with bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Gallina A; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Salonia A; Colombo R; Bianchi M; Chun FK; Hansen J; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    J Sex Med; 2012 Aug; 9(8):2187-94. PubMed ID: 22738395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prospective randomized study of radiofrequency versus ultrasound scalpels on functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Pastore AL; Palleschi G; Silvestri L; Leto A; Sacchi K; Pacini L; Petrozza V; Carbone A
    J Endourol; 2013 Aug; 27(8):989-93. PubMed ID: 23510321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laparoscopic versus open bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy after TUR-P for incidental prostate cancer: surgical outcomes and effect on postoperative urinary continence and sexual potency.
    Springer C; Inferrera A; Pini G; Mohammed N; Fornara P; Greco F
    World J Urol; 2013 Dec; 31(6):1505-10. PubMed ID: 23400788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.
    Menon M; Dalela D; Jamil M; Diaz M; Tallman C; Abdollah F; Sood A; Lehtola L; Miller D; Jeong W
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 29225060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Perioperative and immediate continence outcomes of an initial series.
    Algarra R; Salas T; García S; Arance I; Sánchez de la Muela P
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Oct; 44(8):542-548. PubMed ID: 32536428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: racial considerations for 250 consecutive cases.
    Sayyid RK; Sherwood D; Simpson WG; Terris MK; Klaassen Z; Madi R
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Apr; 15(2):221-228. PubMed ID: 32472391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Role of sparing of puboprostatic ligaments on continence recovery after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Assem A; Abou Youssif T; Hamdy SM; Beltagy AM; Gozen AS
    Scand J Urol; 2021 Feb; 55(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 33241757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.