164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32741117)
1. Prolonged water immersion alters resistance to sliding of aesthetic orthodontic coated wires.
Lin CY; Kim JS; Lin ET; Lin ET
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):111-120. PubMed ID: 32741117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface topography of plain nickel-titanium (NiTi), as-received aesthetic (coated) NiTi, and aesthetic NiTi archwires sterilized by autoclaving or glutaraldehyde immersion: A profilometry/SEM/AFM study.
Shamohammadi M; Hormozi E; Moradinezhad M; Moradi M; Skini M; Rakhshan V
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 30777734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances.
Articolo LC; Kusy RP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 9878956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attractiveness of different esthetic orthodontic wires.
Batista DM; Faccini M; Valarelli FP; Cançado RH; Oliveira RC; Oliveira RCG; Freitas KMS
Dental Press J Orthod; 2020; 25(6):27-32. PubMed ID: 33503122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro sliding-driven morphological changes in representative esthetic NiTi archwire surfaces.
Choi S; Park DJ; Kim KA; Park KH; Park HK; Park YG
Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Oct; 78(10):926-34. PubMed ID: 26278620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of Teflon coating on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic archwires.
Farronato G; Maijer R; Carìa MP; Esposito L; Alberzoni D; Cacciatore G
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 21478301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Friction forces generated by aesthetic Gummetal® (Ti-Nb) orthodontic archwires: A comparative in vitro study.
Albawardi A; Warunek S; Makowka S; Al-Jewair T
Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100683. PubMed ID: 35995715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative in vitro analysis of the sliding resistance of a modern 3D-printed polymer bracket in combination with different archwire types.
Hodecker L; Bourauel C; Braumann B; Kruse T; Christ H; Scharf S
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4049-4057. PubMed ID: 35092503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of frictional resistance after immersion of metal brackets and orthodontic wires in a fluoride-containing prophylactic agent.
Kao CT; Ding SJ; Wang CK; He H; Chou MY; Huang TH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):568.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17110251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
Rajakulendran J; Jones S
Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state.
Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 12226612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
Husain N; Kumar A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of various coating methods on the mechanical, physical, and aesthetic properties of GUMMETAL® archwires: In vitro study.
Zhou A; Makowka S; Warunek S; Chen MY; Al-Jewair T
Int Orthod; 2023 Jun; 21(2):100753. PubMed ID: 37060684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
