208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32741199)
1. Diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for malignant ovarian tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wei M; Bo F; Cao H; Zhou W; Shan W; Bai G
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jul; 62(7):966-978. PubMed ID: 32741199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang L; Tan Y; Dan H; Hu L; Zhang J
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1238-1247. PubMed ID: 32903025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of combined dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Tang M; Min Z; Lu J; Lei X; Zhang X
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):651-60. PubMed ID: 26275624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The assessment of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients with DCE-MRI and DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zong R; Ma X; Shi Y; Geng L
Br J Radiol; 2023 Oct; 96(1150):20230239. PubMed ID: 37660472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI): Quantitative and Semi-quantitative analysis at 3-Tesla MRI.
Gity M; Parviz S; Saligheh Rad H; Fathi Kazerooni A; Shirali E; Shakiba M; Baikpour M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Apr; 20(4):1073-1079. PubMed ID: 31030476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive value of T2-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessing cervical invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.
Bi Q; Chen Y; Chen J; Zhang H; Lei Y; Yang J; Zhang Y; Bi G
Clin Imaging; 2021 Oct; 78():206-213. PubMed ID: 34049140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer detection: An update meta-analysis.
Dong H; Kang L; Cheng S; Zhang R
Thorac Cancer; 2021 Dec; 12(23):3201-3207. PubMed ID: 34668649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive value of Gd-EOB-DTPA -enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for post-hepatectomy liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ding C; Jia J; Bai G; Zhou W; Shan W
Acta Radiol; 2023 Apr; 64(4):1347-1356. PubMed ID: 36303435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guerriero S; Saba L; Pascual MA; Ajossa S; Rodriguez I; Mais V; Alcazar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 51(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 29154402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Xiang W; Rao H; Zhou L
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1423-1432. PubMed ID: 32233072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A meta-analysis.
Li Z; Li J; Lu X; Qu M; Tian J; Lei J
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Oct; 143():109931. PubMed ID: 34492627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI as a diagnostic biomarker for differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Suh CH; Kim HS; Jung SC; Park JE; Choi CG; Kim SJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):560-572. PubMed ID: 30637843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumors.
Li HM; Feng F; Qiang JW; Zhang GF; Zhao SH; Ma FH; Li YA; Gu WY
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3132-3141. PubMed ID: 29556691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A meta-analysis on the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging on ovarian cancer.
Dai G; Liang K; Xiao Z; Yang Q; Yang S
J BUON; 2019; 24(6):2333-2340. PubMed ID: 31983103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of DWI with quantitative ADC values in ovarian tumors: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Pi S; Cao R; Qiang JW; Guo YH
Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1386-1394. PubMed ID: 29463093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.
Jun W; Cong W; Xianxin X; Daqing J
Am Surg; 2019 Jun; 85(6):645-653. PubMed ID: 31267907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with DCE-MRI in complex adnexal masses: A preliminary study.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Soualhi N; Balvay D; Darai E; Cuenod CA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1776-1785. PubMed ID: 28370815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Neovascularization Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
Huang R; Abdelmoneim SS; Ball CA; Nhola LF; Farrell AM; Feinstein S; Mulvagh SL
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2016 Jun; 29(6):491-502. PubMed ID: 27038513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Detecting Residual or Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Liu HF; Zou LQ; Lu XR; Sheng Y; Wang Q; Ding JL; Shi L; Liu SQ; Xing W
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Oct; 52(4):1019-1028. PubMed ID: 31675170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional, doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xun L; Zhai L; Xu H
BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e052830. PubMed ID: 34952878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
